Skip to main content

Is there a more elegant and efficient way to write brainf*** style loops in Mathematica?


I'm having some fun writing a brainf*** interpreter in Mathematica. See this wiki article for more info. It works nicely but I'd like to find an elegant, preferably functional, way to handle the looping structures.


This is a simple example of what I'm hoping to do with the solution I currently have in place. The variable ptr is the position of a pointer in the program. The variable paren is used to keep track of the brackets, it increments on "[" and decrements on "]" so it should be zero when I find the proper closing bracket.


ptr = 1;
paren = 1;
lst = {"[", "[", "-", "]", ">", ">", ">", ".", "<", "<", "<", "]",
">", ">", ">", ">", ">", ">", "."};


While[paren > 0, ptr++;
Switch[lst[[ptr]], "[", paren++, "]", paren--, _, Null]]

Which tells me the closing "]" is located at position 12 in lst.


In[287]:= ptr

Out[287]= 12

Is there a more elegant and/or efficient way to do this?



Answer




My solution isn't precisely what was asked for: it is the complete parser. At the moment, it is strictly a parser, but the functionality is all ready to be added.


Clear[bfinterpreter, bfeval, movf, movb, add1,  sub1, write, read, loop, 
stored, loopdepth, rls]
rls = {">" -> movf, "<" -> movb, "+" -> add1,
"-" -> sub1, "." -> write, "," -> read,
"]" :> With[{mode = loopdepth--}, loop[stored[mode]]]
};

bfeval[a : (">" | "<" | "+" | "-" | "." | "," | "]")] :=
With[{val = a /. rls},

If[loopdepth == 0,
val[ptr],
AppendTo[stored[loopdepth], val]; ## &[]]
]

bfeval["["] := (stored[++loopdepth] = {}; ## &[])
bfeval[_] := (## &[])

bfinterpreter[code_String] :=
Block[{loopdepth = 0, stored, ptr,

movf, movb, add1, sub1, write, read},
bfeval /@ StringSplit[code, ""]
];

A user would access this by passing bfinterpreter as String of BF commands. The string is split into individual characters via StringSplit[code, ""], and then bfeval is mapped over the resulting list. Scan would be better for the full implementation, but I used Map here to show that the parser works. In particular, using this on the OPs supplied BF code we get


(* spaces added for demo purposes *)
bfinterpreter["[[-]>> > . <<<]>>> >>>."]
(*
=> {loop[{ (* [ *)
loop[{sub1}], (* [-] *)

movf, (* > *)
movf, (* > *)
movf, (* > *)
write, (* . *)
movb, (* < *)
movb, (* < *)
movb (* < *)
}
][ptr], (* ] *)
movf[ptr], (* > *)

movf[ptr], (* > *)
movf[ptr], (* > *)
movf[ptr], (* > *)
movf[ptr], (* > *)
movf[ptr], (* > *)
write[ptr] (* . *)
}
*)

As you've probably figured out, all the magic happens in bfeval. The first form accepts all BF characters {">", "<", "+", "-", ".", ",", "]"}, but the open loop, "[". It works by applying a list of replacement rules to the supplied character and either storing it, if we're within a loop, or evaluating it immediately. The close loop rule, though, has added functionality in that it needs to both reduce loop counter, loopdepth, and return the stored commands for the loop, hence the use of RuleDelayed (:>).



The second form of bfeval simply increments the loop counter, and returns ##&[] to ensure the final list doesn't contain Nulls. And, the final form is the catch all for every other type of character.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...