Skip to main content

Arranging elements in a Grid by drag&drop


I have some elements in a Grid. I want to change their positions within that Grid. Can I swap their positions just by dragging cursor on to them?


For example


       Grid[{{1, 2, 5, 7, 9}, {3, 4, 8, 4, 2}, {5, 12, 7, 3, 8}}]

I want to swap positions of 8 and 2 in drag&drop fahion. Is it possible?



Answer



While drag'n'drop isn't officially supported in Mathematica currently (Depending on your definition of support), I believe Wolfram is working on it for a future version, or at least more direct support. I can't remember which screencast, but something was mentioned about this in one of Steven Wolframs talks posted on the official Mathematica blog.


Now to the code, what I do is simply spray around a lot of eventhandlers that set an Id when the mouse is over them, and then wrap my dynamic interface in an eventhandler that calls whatever action I need when you drag from one id to another.



SetAttributes[idElement,HoldFirst]
idElement[currentId_,content_,id_]:=EventHandler[content,{"MouseMoved":>(currentId=id)}]

In this case the action we want to perform is to switch the two elements that have been selected:


action[from_,to_] := If[from!=to,
   {mygrid[[Sequence@@from]],mygrid[[Sequence@@to]]}//
        ({mygrid[[Sequence@@to]],mygrid[[Sequence@@from]]}=#)&]

Now it's just a case of defining the outer EventHandler that calls the action, and a DynamicModule to scope the variables used, just to keep the code nice.


mygrid = {{1, 2, 5, 7, 9}, {3, 4, 8, 4, 2}, {5, 12, 7, 3, 8}};


DynamicModule[{currentId, from},
    EventHandler[Dynamic[

    Grid[MapIndexed[idElement[currentId, #1, #2] &, mygrid, {2}]]

    ],{
      "MouseDown" :> (from = currentId),
      "MouseUp" :> action[from, currentId]
     }]

]

This implementation is however not "just" allowing elements to be swapped, and depending on what you are doing, you may need a lot more interactivity added. For instance you can't edit the number anymore for this simple Grid example


Update:


A slightly nicer method which used unevaluated idTags which are only later replaced to allows a nicer call syntax:


SetAttributes[idTag,Protected]
SetAttributes[idSetter,HoldAll]
idSetter[var_]:=Function[{content,id},EventHandler[content,{"MouseMoved":>(var=id)}]]

 SetAttributes[dragNdrop,HoldFirst]

 dragNdrop[content_,action_]:=
 DynamicModule[{currentId,from},
 EventHandler[

 Dynamic[Block[{idTag=idSetter[currentId]},content]]

 ,{
  "MouseDown":>(from=currentId),
  "MouseUp":> action[from,currentId]}]
]


So then a call to add a dragNdrop fuctionality on some code is simply:


mygrid = {{1, 2, 5, 7, 9}, {3, 4, 8, 4, 2}, {5, 12, 7, 3, 8}};
dragNdrop[
    Grid[MapIndexed[idTag, mygrid, {2}]]
,action]

Added Variable descriptions


currentId stores the id of the element the mouse last moved over, this is used to determine both the element you drag from and the element you drag to. from is used to store the id you dragged from, since it needs to be saved for when actionis called. in idSetter, content is simply the content of the individual items that can be dragged, so in the Grid example, content would be the individual number in the grid.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.
Post a Comment
Read more