Skip to main content

plotting - Inscribed square problem


There is a well-known unsolved problem in geometry:



$\textbf{Toeplitz' conjecture}:$ Every continuous simple closed curve in the plane contains four points that are the vertices of a square.



How to check this conjecture for the "heart curve" by using Mathematica?



 PolarPlot[
2 - 2 Sin[t] + Sin[t] Sqrt[Abs[Cos[t]]]/(Sin[t] + 1.4),
{t, 0,2 Pi}, PlotStyle -> Red, Ticks -> None]

$$r(t )=\frac{\sin (t) \sqrt{\left| \cos (t)\right| }}{\sin (t)+1.4}-2 \sin (t)+2$$ enter image description here


How to find (and plot) four points on the "heart curve" that are the vertices of a square?



Answer



We can use symmetry and find such points that have the same $x$ coordinate and difference of their $y$ coordinates is twice the $x$ coordinate. We use FindRoot and help it with initial point which we choose as the maximum $x$ coordinate - maxXt. Then we need to mirror two points and draw lines between.


r[t_] := 2 - 2 Sin[t] + Sin[t] Sqrt[Abs[Cos[t]]]/(Sin[t] + 1.4)


maxXt = t /. Last@Maximize[r[t] Cos[t], {t}];

sol = FindRoot[{r[t1] Cos[t1] == r[t2] Cos[t2],
r[t1] Sin[t1] - r[t2] Sin[t2] == 2 r[t1] Cos[t1]}, {{t1,
maxXt}, {t2, maxXt}}];
p[t_] := {r[t] Cos[t], r[t] Sin[t]};
vert = p /@ {t1, t2} /. sol; (* two right points *)
vertMir = RotateLeft[{-1, 1} # & /@ vert]; (* two left points in right order for ListPlot*)

Show[PolarPlot[r[t], {t, 0, 2 Pi}, PlotStyle -> Red, Ticks -> None],

ListPlot[vert~Join~vertMir~Join~vert[[1 ;; 1]], Joined -> True, PlotMarkers -> Automatic]]

enter image description here



Update: Finding a similar heart that has $45^o$ tilted square inscribed too.



At $t=\pi/2$ and $t=-\pi/2$ we have points with singularity. Let's see if we can deform the heart so our inscribed square will have its diagonal between those points.


r[t_, b_] := 2 - 2 Sin[t] + b Sin[t] Sqrt[Abs[Cos[t]]]/(Sin[t] + 1.4);
Manipulate[
Show[#, Frame -> True] &@

PolarPlot[r[t, b], {t, 0, 2 Pi}, PlotStyle -> Red, Ticks -> None,
Axes -> None, PlotRange -> {{-2.5, 2.5}, {-4, 1}}], {b, 0, 2,
0.05}]

enter image description here


We need to find parameter b such that at $t = ${Pi/2, 5 Pi/4, 3 Pi/2, 7 Pi/4} we are getting a square. It's easy we just have to state that


$r(5\pi/4,b)\sqrt 2 = r(3\pi/2,b)$


The other not tilted square is still there so we can find it the same way as earlier.


bDiag = b /. 
FindRoot[r[5 Pi/4, b] Sqrt[2] == r[3 Pi/2, b], {b, 0.8}]; (* b=0.682619 *)

diag = r[#, bDiag] {Cos[#], Sin[#]} & /@ {Pi/2, 5 Pi/4, 3 Pi/2,7 Pi/4, Pi/2};

sol = FindRoot[{r[t1, bDiag] Cos[t1] == r[t2, bDiag] Cos[t2],
r[t1, bDiag] Sin[t1] - r[t2, bDiag] Sin[t2] ==
2 r[t1, bDiag] Cos[t1]}, {{t1, Pi/8, 0, Pi/4}, {t2, -Pi/4, -Pi/2,
0}}];
p[t_] := {r[t, bDiag] Cos[t], r[t, bDiag] Sin[t]};
vert = p /@ {t1, t2} /. sol;
vertMir = RotateLeft[{-1, 1} # & /@ vert];
str = vert~Join~vertMir~Join~vert[[1 ;; 1]];


Show[PolarPlot[r[t, bDiag], {t, 0, 2 Pi}, PlotStyle -> Red, Axes -> None],
ListPlot[{str, diag}, Joined -> True, PlotMarkers -> Automatic],Frame ->True]

enter image description here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...