Skip to main content

character encoding - Unicode-aware string functions?


I've recently discovered that ToUpperCase is quite unreliable on non-ASCII input:


see code below



In[31]:= ToUpperCase@{"éàÇœßþσς", "ijķnjđӽծ", "ÿ"}
Out[31]= {"ÉÀÇŒSSÞ∑∑", "ijķnjđӽծ", "Y"}

So: it handles some accented ASCII, ligatures, Western European stuff, greek and cyrillic, while it fails on others (returning the lowercase characters themselves when they have valid uppercase variants). In at least one case, it fails utterly (the uppercase version of ÿ is Ÿ, not Y).


Mathematica’s documentation is very short on specifics on Unicode support. It broadly states that:



Mathematica has efficient systemwide 16-bit Unicode support, allowing a full range of international, technical and other character sets and character encodings.



which of course I very much doubt after seeing the above. More specifically, the ToUpperCase doc does not include a mention of Unicode.





So, after that bleak assessment, the question is the following: how do I get better Unicode-compliant string manipulation functions? (mostly ToUpperCase and ToLowerCase for now, but I'm sure others will be a problem for me in the future). Are there internal functions that do this, or external packages? Have I missed something in M’s documentation?




On a humorous note: the documentation for ToUpperCase even uses my example of a buggy transform (ÿ) in an example. It is, however, used about an unrelated issue, to warn users that “for a few characters, ToLowerCase is not the inverse of ToUpperCase” (as might be expected by Unicode-unaware programmers):


enter image description here




Answer



See if this helps:


Needs["JLink`"];
ClearAll[toUpperCase];
toUpperCase[s_String] :=
JavaBlock[JavaNew["java.lang.String", s]@toUpperCase[]];

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.