Skip to main content

character encoding - Unicode-aware string functions?


I've recently discovered that ToUpperCase is quite unreliable on non-ASCII input:


see code below



In[31]:= ToUpperCase@{"éàÇœßþσς", "ijķnjđӽծ", "ÿ"}
Out[31]= {"ÉÀÇŒSSÞ∑∑", "ijķnjđӽծ", "Y"}

So: it handles some accented ASCII, ligatures, Western European stuff, greek and cyrillic, while it fails on others (returning the lowercase characters themselves when they have valid uppercase variants). In at least one case, it fails utterly (the uppercase version of ÿ is Ÿ, not Y).


Mathematica’s documentation is very short on specifics on Unicode support. It broadly states that:



Mathematica has efficient systemwide 16-bit Unicode support, allowing a full range of international, technical and other character sets and character encodings.



which of course I very much doubt after seeing the above. More specifically, the ToUpperCase doc does not include a mention of Unicode.





So, after that bleak assessment, the question is the following: how do I get better Unicode-compliant string manipulation functions? (mostly ToUpperCase and ToLowerCase for now, but I'm sure others will be a problem for me in the future). Are there internal functions that do this, or external packages? Have I missed something in M’s documentation?




On a humorous note: the documentation for ToUpperCase even uses my example of a buggy transform (ÿ) in an example. It is, however, used about an unrelated issue, to warn users that “for a few characters, ToLowerCase is not the inverse of ToUpperCase” (as might be expected by Unicode-unaware programmers):


enter image description here




Answer



See if this helps:


Needs["JLink`"];
ClearAll[toUpperCase];
toUpperCase[s_String] :=
JavaBlock[JavaNew["java.lang.String", s]@toUpperCase[]];

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...