Skip to main content

plotting - Module inside of Manipulate Example


Here is a very nice example from The Student's Introduction to MATHEMATICA.


Manipulate[Module[{x, y},

ContourPlot[Exp[-x^2 - y^2] + x y, {x, -1, 1}, {y, -1, 1},
Contours -> 20,
Epilog ->
Dynamic[{Arrow[{pt,
pt + {y - 2 E^(-x^2 - y^2) x, x - 2 E^(-x^2 - y^2) y} /. {x ->
pt[[1]], y -> pt[[2]]}}]}]
]],
{{pt, {.5, .5}}, Locator,
Appearance -> Graphics[{Red, Disk[]}, ImageSize -> 5]}]


Which produces a wonderful demonstration.


enter image description here


My next step was to try the following:


Clear[x, y, f];
f = E^(-x^2 - y^2) + x y;
Grad[f, {x, y}];

Then in the next cell, I tried:


Manipulate[Module[{x, y},
ContourPlot[f, {x, -1, 1}, {y, -1, 1},

Contours -> 20,
Epilog ->
Dynamic[{Arrow[{pt,
pt + Grad[f, {x, y}] /. {x -> pt[[1]], y -> pt[[2]]}}]}]
]],
{{pt, {.5, .5}}, Locator,
Appearance -> Graphics[{Red, Disk[]}, ImageSize -> 5]}]

Which gave only this:


enter image description here



I gave Evaluate a try but that didn't work. So I tried removing the Module.


Manipulate[
ContourPlot[f, {x, -1, 1}, {y, -1, 1},
Contours -> 20,
Epilog ->
Dynamic[{Arrow[{pt,
pt + Grad[f, {x, y}] /. {x -> pt[[1]], y -> pt[[2]]}}]}]
],
{{pt, {.5, .5}}, Locator,
Appearance -> Graphics[{Red, Disk[]}, ImageSize -> 5]}]


And that worked.


enter image description here


But try typing


x=12

in the next cell and watch what happens to the arrow.


Finally I tried wrapping everything with a DynamicModule to see if it would prevent the x=12 issue in the notebook. First, this cell.


Clear[x, y, f];
f = E^(-x^2 - y^2) + x y;

Grad[f, {x, y}];

Then:


DynamicModule[{x, y},
Manipulate[
ContourPlot[f, {x, -1, 1}, {y, -1, 1},
Contours -> 20,
Epilog ->
Dynamic[{Arrow[{pt,
pt + Grad[f, {x, y}] /. {x -> pt[[1]], y -> pt[[2]]}}]}]

],
{{pt, {.5, .5}}, Locator,
Appearance -> Graphics[{Red, Disk[]}, ImageSize -> 5]}]]

This only produced:


enter image description here


As folks know, there has been a lot of discussion on not using Module inside of Manipulate and this is probably a good example of why not, but there is a lot of stuff happening here that I don't understand and could use some discussion explaining some of the issues:




  1. Why does Dynamic in the first code just update the arrow and not the contour plot.





  2. Why doesn't f = E^(-x^2 - y^2) + x y; and Grad[f, {x, y}]; work in the second piece of code?




  3. Why doesn't DynamicModule work in the last piece of code?




  4. And what is the best way to protect the arrow if a student type x=12 in their notebook?





Answers to Questions #3 and #4:


I should have defined the function f in the body of my dynamic module.


DynamicModule[{x, y, f},
f = E^(-x^2 - y^2) + x y;
Manipulate[
ContourPlot[f, {x, -1, 1}, {y, -1, 1}, Contours -> 20,
Epilog ->
Dynamic[{Arrow[{pt,
pt + Grad[f, {x, y}] /. {x -> pt[[1]],

y -> pt[[2]]}}]}]], {{pt, {.5, .5}}, Locator,
Appearance -> Graphics[{Red, Disk[]}, ImageSize -> 5]}]]

This works and x is protected.



Answer



Both Module and DynamicModule are shadowing the global variables x and y in the example in which you use them. The demonstration is best written without using either Module or DynamicModule.


Manipulate[
ContourPlot[f, {x, -1, 1}, {y, -1, 1}, Contours -> 20,
Epilog -> Dynamic[Arrow[{pt, pt + grad /. {x -> pt[[1]], y -> pt[[2]]}}]]],
{f, None},

{grad, None},
{{pt, {.5, .5}}, Locator, Appearance -> Graphics[{Red, Disk[]}, ImageSize -> 5]},
TrackedSymbols :> {pt},
Initialization :> (
f = E^(-x^2 - y^2) + x y;
grad = Grad[f, {x, y}])]

plot


Update


Sorry that I was careless about the testing of my code. The issue that you raise in your comment can be fixed by using pure functions. I do need to introduce Module in the fix.



My reworking of your example still keeps everything localized, Specifying controls that are non-functioning and invisible, like func and grad, is a useful trick for creating localized variables in Manipulate expressions,


x = 12; y = 42; func = 1; grad = 0;
Manipulate[
ContourPlot[func[x, y], {x, -1, 1}, {y, -1, 1},
Contours -> 20,
Epilog -> Dynamic[Arrow[{pt, pt + grad[pt[[1]], pt[[2]]]}]]],
{func, None},
{grad, None},
{{pt, {.5, .5}}, Locator, Appearance -> Graphics[{Red, Disk[]}, ImageSize -> 5]},
TrackedSymbols :> {pt},

Initialization :> (
func = (E^(-#1^2 - #2^2) + #1 #2 &);
grad =
With[{
g = Module[{x, y},
Grad[func[x, y], {x, y}] /. {x -> #1, y -> #2}]},
Function[g]])]

The code taken from The Student's Introduction to MATHEMATICA works because it doesn't define functions, but uses expressions for both the function and the gradient. I don't like that approach because it is too rigidly coupled to a particular function. With my fixed code you only need to redefine func to introduce a new function. For example


Manipulate[

ContourPlot[func[x, y], {x, -1, 1}, {y, -1, 1},
Contours -> 20,
Epilog -> Dynamic[Arrow[{pt, pt + grad[pt[[1]], pt[[2]]]}]]],
{func, None},
{grad, None},
{{pt, {0, .1}}, Locator, Appearance -> Graphics[{Red, Disk[]}, ImageSize -> 5]},
TrackedSymbols :> {pt},
Initialization :> (
func = (E^(#1^2 - #2^2) &);
grad =

With[{
g = Module[{x, y},
Grad[func[x, y], {x, y}] /. {x -> #1, y -> #2}]},
Function[g]])]

new-func


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...