Skip to main content

numerical integration - Multidimensional NIntegral with singularity


I am dealing with an integral


$F(k)=-\int d^2p d^2q\frac1{\lvert p\rvert}\frac1{\lvert p-q\rvert}(\frac1{\lvert k-q\rvert}-\frac1{\lvert q\rvert})$


when I am evaluating it at some point, say k=30



NIntegrate[-p q/p/Sqrt[p^2 + q^2 - 2 p q Cos[\[Phi]p - \[Phi]q]](1/
Sqrt[30^2 + q^2 - 60 q Cos[\[Phi]q]]-1/q), {p, 0, 50}, {q, 0,
50}, {\[Phi]p, 0, 2 \[Pi]}, {\[Phi]q, 0, 2 \[Pi]}]

MMA gives 1397.63 with warning


NIntegrate::slwcon: Numerical integration converging too slowly; suspect one 
of the following: singularity, value of the integration is 0, highly
oscillatory integrand, or WorkingPrecision too small.

NIntegrate::eincr: The global error of the strategy GlobalAdaptive has

increased more than 2000 times. The global error is expected to decrease
monotonically after a number of integrand evaluations. Suspect one of the
following: the working precision is insufficient for the specified precision
goal; the integrand is highly oscillatory or it is not a (piecewise) smooth
function; or the true value of the integral is 0. Increasing the value of the
GlobalAdaptive option MaxErrorIncreases might lead to a convergent numerical
integration. NIntegrate obtained -3120.06+0.187845 I and 1266.8675450228204`
for the integral and error estimates.

The integtal has singularity but should be converget. I tried to increase Maxrecursion Minrecursion or Working precision does not help.



Besides, if I split the integral in to 2 parts from bracket of the formula and integrate separately


NIntegrate[-p q/p/Sqrt[p^2 + q^2 - 2 p q Cos[\[Phi]p - \[Phi]q]]/
Sqrt[30^2 + q^2 - 60 q Cos[\[Phi]q]], {p, 0, 50}, {q, 0,
50}, {\[Phi]p, 0, 2 \[Pi]}, {\[Phi]q, 0, 2 \[Pi]}]

answer is -3120.06 + 0.187845 I


NIntegrate[-p q/p/Sqrt[p^2 + q^2 - 2 p q Cos[\[Phi]p - \[Phi]q]]/
q, {p, 0, 50}, {q, 0, 50}, {\[Phi]p, 0, 2 \[Pi]}, {\[Phi]q, 0,
2 \[Pi]}]


answer is -4638.95 + 1.66533*10^-16 I


with imaginary parts


I saw some other post with similar question, some answer suggest using


    Method -> "MonteCarlo", PrecisionGoal -> 1

It does work for me, gives result 1220.21 with no warning I don't know how much can I trust this result Because the answer changes slightly together with warning when I increase Precisiongoal


NIntegrate::maxp: The integral failed to converge after 50100 integrand 
evaluations. NIntegrate obtained -3233.79 and 35.28825355386109` for the
integral and error estimates.


I need trustful answer for other part of the program, any suggestions?




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...