Skip to main content

performance tuning - FinishDynamic[] does not wait for display to finish



Bug introduced in 10.4 or earlier and persists through V11.2



[CASE:3993499]





If your UI contains a couple of heavy/big elements, or one heavy and couple of slightly heavy, because delay accumulates and you can't capture rendering finished event.


Please run the code sample


enter image description here


With addition to the delay issue, the second progress indicator does not appear at all. It is because FinishDynamic[] does not seem to care about the rendering time.


So if the second procedure starts before rendering of the first is finished, it will miss the progress indicator trigger.



This example is artificial but will affect your gui if it is a little bit more complex/heavy.


Question


Is there something like FinishRendering[]? Or how to queue procedures which involve noticeable rendering?


I will wait for WRI confirmation but for me it is a because:



FinishDynamic[] does not return until all Dynamic objects are updated and displayed.


- ref/FinishDynamic





(*in case evertyhing works well or FE crash, please modify `n` value.*)


DynamicModule[
{ processing1=False,processing2=False}
, data=panel1=panel2={}
; n=5 10^4
; update1[]:=panel1=Graphics[Line@data,Frame->True]
; update2[]:=panel2=Graphics[Line@data,Frame->True]
; Grid[{{
Button["run me"
, processing1=True (* trigger the first progressindicator*)

; data=RandomReal[1,{n,2}]
; Pause[.1] (* artificial pause to mimic a time consumig `data` creation. allows to clearly see progress indicator*)
; update1[] (* create graphics *)
; processing1=False (* trigger the first graphics to appear *)

; FinishDynamic[] (* wait till everything is done *)

; processing2=True (* analogous procedure for the second plot, fails *)
; Pause[.1]
; update2[]

; processing2=False
, Method->"Queued"
, ImageSize->100 {1,1}
]
, Dynamic[
If[processing1, Dynamic@ProgressIndicator[Appearance->"Indeterminate"],panel1]
, TrackedSymbols:>{processing1}
]
, Dynamic[
If[processing2,Dynamic@ProgressIndicator[Appearance->"Indeterminate"],panel2]

, TrackedSymbols:>{processing2}
]
}}, BaseStyle->CacheGraphics->False
]
]


[CASE:3993499] was created




Answer




I'm still interested in workarounds / coding practices to deal with this issue.


Meanwhile, to take it off an unanswered stack, here is a confirmation from WRI Support:



[...] I do agree something is off here, [...] . I have filed a report with our developers asking that they identify the issue and look to address it.


If FinishDynamic is not meant to handle extra rendering time, I will file a suggestion that we create a FinishRendering function to handle cases like this. [...]



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...