Skip to main content

function construction - Passing unquoted strings (poor man's enumeration)


I would like to be able to pass an unquoted string as a parameter to a Mathematica function [that I am writing] and have it show up without evaluation if the string happens to be defined. Thus I would like


Clear["Global`*"]
f[x_] := Print[ToString[x]];
f[Middle] (* prints the string Middle *)
Middle = 3
f[Middle] (* prints the string Middle *)

Obviously this cannot work the way I've written it. Yet it is legal to write



Plot[g[x],{x,0,3}, PlotStyle->Black]

and Black happens to be a protected variable, so it will never be defined.


How can I emulate, or come close to emulating, this behavior. I'm willing to put up with some compromises in the function invocation syntax (in particular, the option syntax opt->Middle would be fine).


Apologies if this is somewhere in the docs. I couldn't find it...


Thanks.


Addendum: While J.M.'s solution answers the question I posed above, I would also like the following to work:


Clear["Global`*"]
SetAttributes[foo,HoldAll];
foo[x_] := Print[ToString[Unevaluated[x]]];

Table[foo[i],{i,{a,b,c}}] (* prints {i,i,i}, as expected *)
Table[foo[Evaluate[i]], {i,{a,b,c}}] (* prints {a,b,c} as expected *)
a = 3
Table[foo[Evaluate[i]], {i,{a,b,c}}] (* prints {3,b,c} *)

I would like the last line to print {a,b,c} just like the one before it - that is, I'd like i evaluated only once. Am I asking too much?


For context: this is part of a larger function that computes something, but does so in different ways depending on the setting of a mode parameter. I want to be able to pass in that mode parameter without evaluation; hence the original question. But I also want to be able to invoke the function inside a Table function as above. Here's a simple example:


Clear["Global`*"]
SetAttributes[foo,HoldAll];
foo[x_] := Block[{z=ToString[Unevaluated[x]]}, If[x == "square", x^2, x+1]];

Table[Integrate[foo[Evaluate[i]],{x,0,3}],{i,{"square", "xyzzy"}}];
{9, 45/2}
a=3
Table[Integrate[foo[Evaluate[i]],{x,0,3}],{i,{"square", "xyzzy"}}];
{45/2, 45/2}

since in the second invocation the parameter to foo has the value 3, not the value a. How can I achieve both of these behaviors?



Answer



This seems to work:


SetAttributes[f, HoldAll];

f[x_] := Print[ToString[Unevaluated[x]]]

Now, try Middle = 3; f[Middle].


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...