Skip to main content

How to split data into clusters based on fitting to function


I have data which looks somewhat like this:


data


On the picture, you can see that the data can be described by 2 linear functions - if you manage to split it into 2 groups, each can easily be fitted with a x + b


However, when I run FindClusters on that data, I get this:


clusters


It seems, I need to adjust it somehow


Can anyone show me how to properly use FindClusters to split this data?



UPDATE


The functions are all known and the same.


To play with, the data can be emulated with:


dd = Join[Table[ {x, .3 x + 2 + RandomReal[{-1, 1}]}, {x, 0, 100}], 
Table[ {x, .6 x - 20 + RandomReal[{-1, 1}]}, {x, 0,
100}]]; ListPlot[dd]; cc = FindClusters[dd]; ListPlot[cc]

Answer



If we can assume we know more or less the functions for the two groups, in this case two linear functions (two parameters each) we can just NMinimize for the Min distance of the two functions.


{w, sol} = NMinimize[
Total[

Map[
Min[Abs[#[[2]] - (n1 + m1 #[[1]])],
Abs[#[[2]] - (n2 + m2 #[[1]])]] &
, dd
]
], {n1, n2, m1, m2}]


{95.3241, {n1 -> 1.84575, n2 -> -19.8623, m1 -> 0.300732,  m2 -> 0.598053}}


Once we have extracted the parameters for the two functions, then we just GatherBy each point, based on which function is closer.


ListPlot@Module[{n1, n2, m1, m2},
{n1, n2, m1, m2} = Values[sol];
GatherBy[dd,
LessEqual[Abs[#[[2]] - (n1 + m1 #[[1]])],
Abs[#[[2]] - (n2 + m2 #[[1]])]] &]
]


Mathematica graphics




More general


Define your function with arbitrary number of parameters


func[parms_List][x_] := parms[[1]] + parms[[2]]  x

A distance function


dist[f_][{x_, y_}] := Abs[y - f[x]]

Or (after comment by @SampoSmolander)


dist[f_][{x_, y_}] := (y - f[x])^2


Fake data


dd = Table[
With[
{
a = RandomChoice[{1, 4}],
b = RandomChoice[{1/2, 2}]
}, {x, func[{a, b}][x] + RandomReal[{-1, 1}]}], {x, 0, 10,
0.01}];


Minimisation, The i index goes through the number of parameters of each function (here 2), the index j over the number of functions to fit (in this case 4).


sol2 = Last@With[{n = 2, m = 4},
NMinimize[
Total@Map[Function[{L}, Min @@ Table[
dist[func[Array[c[#, k] &, n]]][L]
, {k, m}]], dd]
, Flatten[Table[c[i, j], {i, n}, {j, m}]]]
]

Plot



Show[
ListPlot@GatherBy[
dd
, Position[#, Min[#]] &[
Table[dist[func[{c[1, k], c[2, k]} /. sol2]][#], {k, 4}]] &
],
Plot[
Evaluate[
Table[
func[{c[1, k], c[2, k]}][x]

, {k, 4}] /. sol2
]
, {x, 0, 10}
]]


Mathematica graphics



Obviously there is no way to be sure this will converge to reasonable clusters if the lines are too mixed or the functions too complicated.


Fitting different number of functions



Let's see how does this perform when there are four groups of points and we ask for m different number of clusters, from 1 to 6.


plots = Table[
sol2 = Last@With[{n = 2},
NMinimize[
Total@Map[Function[{L}, Min @@ Table[
dist[func[Array[c[#, k] &, n]]][L]
, {k, m}]], dd]
, Flatten[Table[c[i, j], {i, n}, {j, m}]]]
];
ListPlot[

GatherBy[
dd
, Position[#, Min[#]] &[
Table[dist[func[{c[1, k], c[2, k]} /. sol2]][#], {k, m}]] &
], PlotLabel -> m], {m, 6}];

Grid@Partition[plots, 2]

Mathematica graphics


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...