Skip to main content

Share a method to patch the discontinuous line in a image


Similar to this post which I have posted before(How to patch fingerprint ridges),Its solution's level higher than my expectation.So cost my these days to research this.Now I'm glad to share my fruit in here,You can use this code to produce a broken heart line.


SetAttributes[RandomDrop, HoldFirst]

RandomDrop[list_, n_] :=
Module[{pre, temp},
Do[pre = RandomInteger[{1, Length[list]}]; temp = RandomInteger[25];
If[pre + temp <= Length[list],
list = Drop[list, {pre, pre + temp}], Continue[]], n]; list]

MakeBrokenHeart[n_] :=
Module[{sortpos, graph, pos},
graph = ContourPlot[((1.2 x)^2 + (1.4 y)^2 - 1)^3 - (1.3 x)^2 y^3 ==
0, {x, -1.5, 1.5}, {y, -3/2, 3/2}, AspectRatio -> Automatic,

Frame -> False, PlotPoints -> 200];
pos = PixelValuePositions[graph // Binarize // ColorNegate, 1];
sortpos = pos[[Last@FindShortestTour[pos]]];
Binarize@ImageRotate@
ImagePad[
ImageCrop@Image[SparseArray[RandomDrop[sortpos, n] -> 1]], 5]]

Answer



What you have here is called a matching problem in graph theory: You want to connect a set of nodes so that



  • each node is connected to exactly to one edge,


  • and some cost function over the edges is minimized.


I can't find a built-in function for solving matching problems, but it's not hard to convert it to a linear programming problem.


First, I'll find all the endpoints:


img = Binarize@Import["http://i.stack.imgur.com/zWNUV.png"]    
endPoints =
PixelValuePositions[MorphologicalTransform[img, "EndPoints"], 1];
endPointIndices = Range[Length[endPoints]];

Then I make a list of edges that connect each node to it's 4 closest neighbors (you could also start with a complete graph and get the same result in the end; this just keeps the search space smaller):



near = Nearest[endPoints -> endPointIndices];    
allEdges = DeleteDuplicates@Flatten@Table[
edge[Sort[{i, j}]], {i, endPointIndices}, {j,
Rest@near[endPoints[[i]], 5]}];

Now allEdges contains a list of the form edge[{1, 3}], edge[{1, 5}], edge[{1, 6}]..., connecting each node to its neighbors:


HighlightImage[img, allEdges /. edge[idx_] :> Line[endPoints[[idx]]]]

enter image description here


Next I want a rough direction for each endpoint. There are a lot of ways to do this. I'll simply select, for each end point, the points in the same arc that are closer than 20 pixels and take the mean of those points:



components = Image@MorphologicalComponents[img];
endPointNeighbors = Table[
pointsInSameComponent =
PixelValuePositions[components, PixelValue[components, pt]];
N@Mean[Select[pointsInSameComponent, Norm[# - pt] < 20 &]]
, {pt, endPoints}];

endPointNeighbors[[i]] now contains the center of the neighbors on the same arc as endpoint[[i]]:


HighlightImage[img, 
Table[Arrow[{endPointNeighbors[[i]], endPoints[[i]]}], {i,

endPointIndices}]]

enter image description here


So that gives me the "direction" from each endpoint:


endPointDirection[i_] := 
Normalize[endPoints[[i]] - endPointNeighbors[[i]]]

and I can define a "cost" for each edge:


edgeCost[edge[{i_, j_}]] := 
Norm[endPoints[[i]] - endPoints[[j]]] +

10*endPointDirection[i].endPointDirection[j]

(I've used a weighted sum of the distance of the end points and the scalar product of the edge directions. You can read it as "if the lines point in the same direction, make the edge 10 pixels longer; if the lines point in opposite directions, make it 10 pixels shorter". So edges pointing in the right direction are cheaper. You could probably come up with a smarter cost function.)


So far so well. Now I'll use FindMinimum to find a set of edges that minimizes the cost, and assigns exactly one edge to each end point.


I'll use variables connected[{i, j}], where connected[{i,j}] == 1 means that endpoints i and j are connected, so I have the variables:


allVariables = allEdges /. edge[idx__] :> connected[idx];

and the total cost of all connected edges:


cost = Total[
allEdges /. e : edge[{i_, j_}] :> N@edgeCost[e]*connected[{i, j}]];


The connected[{i,j}]-variables should all be between 0 and 1 (in fact, the result will always be 0 or 1, exactly):


connectedRange = allEdges /. edge[idx__] :> 0 <= connected[idx] <= 1;

And I want each end point to be connected to exactly one edge:


singleEdge = Table[
Total[Cases[allEdges,
edge[idx_] /; MemberQ[idx, i] :> connected[idx]]] == 1,
{i, endPointIndices}];


Optimization:


{totalCost, solution} = 
FindMinimum[Flatten[{cost, connectedRange, singleEdge}],
allVariables];

yields a solution that looks like this:



connected[{1, 3}] -> 1., connected[{1, 5}] -> 0., connected[{1, 6}] -> 0., connected[{1, 9}] -> 0., connected[{2, 4}] -> 1.



So we can pick the edges where connected is 1:



connectedEdges = Pick[allEdges, Round[allVariables /. solution], 1];

and display them:


HighlightImage[img, 
connectedEdges /. edge[idx_] :> Line[endPoints[[idx]]]]

enter image description here


The algorithm is guaranteed to connect every end point to exactly one edge (and will therefore fail if the number of end points is odd), and it will always have the lowest possible cost (it's a linear programming problem, so FindMinimum is fast and guaranteed to find the optimal solution`). But the quality of the final matching will depend on the edge cost function, of course.


So for example, if I only minimize the distance between edges, I'll get this matching:


enter image description here



The total distance of all the edges is shorter, so the algorithm is correct. Or in other words: You'll probably have to play with the cost function a little to get the results you want.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...