Skip to main content

linear algebra - How to estimate the matrix condition number in the 2-Norm?



The Mathematica documentation says it is possible to estimate the matrix condition number in norms 1, 2, and ∞. But the 2-norm raises a message.


This is an extract from reference documentation "tutorial/LinearAlgebraMatrixComputations" where I changed the expression to compute the 2-Norm.


error


UPDATE


As requested, if you want to try by yourself and check the error on your system, simply type:


mat = {{1., 2.}, {3., 4.}};
LinearAlgebra`MatrixConditionNumber[mat, Norm -> 2]

Answer



The compatibility information at Compatibility/tutorial/LinearAlgebra/MatrixManipulation says




These functions were available in previous versions of Mathematica and are now available on the web at library.wolfram.com/infocenter/MathSource/6770:


LinearEquationsToMatrices
InverseMatrixNorm
ConditionNumber



You can download the original package there. It's too long to provide an excerpt here, but you can load it and use it in your code as-is.


(There seems to be a vestigial version of LinearAlgebra`MatrixConditionNumber which, as you noticed, only supports norms 1 and ∞.)


On the other hand, if you are okay with the computation involved in producing an exact answer, the documentation for SingularValueList says



The 2-norm of a matrix is equal to the largest singular value … The 2-norm of the inverse is equal to the reciprocal of the smallest singular value … [Thus,] The condition number of the matrix is equal to the ratio of largest to smallest singular values.




So you can use:


First@#/Last@#& @ SingularValueList[mat]



The old implementation for 2-norms is considerably faster for large random matrices (it is worth noting that both implementations seem to take advantage of multiple cores):


performance


While the relative error stays low (this may depend on the precision of your input):


error



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...