Skip to main content

How can I remove matching sublists from my list?


I want to use DeleteCases (or any appropriate function) to remove elements of a list, which in turn are lists of fixed size. The rule I wish to apply is that any element of the list which already appear elsewhere in the list, up to any number of -1 is to be removed. But I don't know how to do this kind of tricky pattern matching. For example, I have the following list:


myData = {{h -> 255.155, c -> 0, s -> -10000.},
{h -> -255.155, c -> 0, s -> 10000.},

{h -> 0, c -> 0, s -> 10000.},
{h -> 0, c -> 0, s -> -10000.},
{h -> 255.155, c -> 0, s -> 10000.},
{h -> -255.155, c -> 0, s -> -10000.},
{h -> -255.155, c -> 1870.83, s -> 3535.53},
{h -> 255.155, c -> -1870.83, s -> -3535.53},
{h -> 0, c -> 1870.83, s -> 3535.53},
{h -> 0, c -> -1870.83, s -> -3535.53},
{h -> 255.155, c -> 1870.83, s -> 3535.53},
{h -> -255.155, c -> -1870.83, s -> -3535.53},

{h -> 255.155, c -> -4000., s -> 0},
{h -> -255.155, c -> 4000., s -> 0},
{h -> 0, c -> 4000., s -> 0},
{h -> 0, c -> -4000., s -> 0},
{h -> 255.155, c -> 4000., s -> 0},
{h -> -255.155, c -> -4000., s -> 0},
{h -> 255.155, c -> 1870.83, s -> -3535.53},
{h -> -255.155, c -> -1870.83, s -> 3535.53},
{h -> 0, c -> 1870.83, s -> -3535.53},
{h -> 0, c -> -1870.83, s -> 3535.53},

{h -> 255.155, c -> -1870.83, s -> 3535.53},
{h -> -255.155, c -> 1870.83, s -> -3535.53},
{h -> 255.155, c -> 0, s -> 0},
{h -> -255.155, c -> 0, s -> 0},
{h -> 0, c -> 0, s -> 0}}

As can be seen the first element myData[[1]] (which is a list of three items) is a duplicate (up to the minus signs) myData[[2]] myData[[5]] myData[[6]]. But I don't know how to get Mathematica to remove these.


As an added bonus, it would be nice that, among the ones that are duplicates up to -1, the one with the least number of negatives is kept, and all others are removed. (In the example above, myData[[5]] would be among those that would be kept.)



Answer



The problem with both Union - based and DeleteDuplicates - based solutions is that both functions have quadratic complexity in the size of the list, for an explicit comparison function. Here is code which should be much faster for larger lists:



Reap[
Sow[#, Abs[{{h, c, s} /. #}]] & /@ myData,
_,
First@#2[[Ordering[UnitStep[-{h, c, s} /. #2]]]] &
][[2]]

(*
{{h->255.155,c->0,s->10000.},{h->0,c->0,s->10000.},
{h->255.155,c->1870.83,s->3535.53},{h->0,c->1870.83,s->3535.53},
{h->255.155,c->4000.,s->0},{h->0,c->4000.,s->0},

{h->255.155,c->0,s->0},{h->0,c->0,s->0}}
*)

It is based on tagging the list entries with some function of the entry that serves as an equivalence tag, and then postprocessing the resulting lists. It should have a near-linear complexity with respect to the length of the list.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....