Skip to main content

programming - Is it possible to use Begin and End inside a Manipulate?



May be someone can explain why I can't use Begin["context`"] and End[] inside a Manipulate expression, or inside the initialization section?


When I use it in the Manipulate expression, and close the notebook and restart, I get the error:


enter image description here


Here is the code, please feel free to modify as needed. I am just trying to see if the idea of different contexts can be used inside Manipulate. It is just not seeing obj`f[] at all.


Manipulate[

Begin["obj`"];
f[y_] := y^2 + 1;
End[];


{x, Date[], obj`f[1]},

{{x, 0, "x"}, 0, 10, 1, Appearance -> "Labeled"},
TrackedSymbols :> {x}
]

I also tried in the initialization section, same problem. I think this is because Manipulate itself is a Dynamic module, it does not like new context created inside it?


This is a snapshot of the above:


DynamicModule[{x = 5}, 
Begin["obj`"];

f[y_] := y^2 + 1;
End[];
{x, Date[], obj`f[1]}
]

Outside Manipulate, it works fine of course: (restating kernel helps before running this below again after the above just in case)


Begin["obj`"];
f[y_] := y^2 + 1;
End[];


obj`f[2]

gives 5



Answer



Short answer: yes, it is possible.


The problem is that parsing is done line-by-line only for the top-level code. For code inside some head(s), it is first parsed as a whole. Therefore, your f is parsed to Global`f, and this is why that symbol is used. Here is what you can do, schematically:


DynamicModule[{x = 5},
With[{def = MakeBoxes[f[y_] := y^2 + 1;], ff = MakeBoxes[f]},
Block[{$ContextPath},
BeginPackage["obj`"];

ReleaseHold[MakeExpression@ff];
Begin["`Private`"];
ReleaseHold[MakeExpression@def];
End[];
EndPackage[]]
];
{x, Date[], obj`f[1]}]

What we do here is to delay the parsing (or, more precisely, the last stage of it) of our definition until run-time, converting it first to boxes and thus preventing its premature parsing. I used a similar technique in my answer in this thread. We could have converted to strings, but I prefer boxes as being still "on this side of Mathematica".


Note that a side effect of this code is that a symbol f is still created in the context which is current when the code executes (Global` here). If you want to avoid that, you could insert Remove[f] before Block. I went all the way to use `Private` sub-context, to avoid polluting the current context with some auxiliary symbols created during assignments.



You can also automate this code with some meta-programming.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....