Skip to main content

programming - Is it possible to use Begin and End inside a Manipulate?



May be someone can explain why I can't use Begin["context`"] and End[] inside a Manipulate expression, or inside the initialization section?


When I use it in the Manipulate expression, and close the notebook and restart, I get the error:


enter image description here


Here is the code, please feel free to modify as needed. I am just trying to see if the idea of different contexts can be used inside Manipulate. It is just not seeing obj`f[] at all.


Manipulate[

Begin["obj`"];
f[y_] := y^2 + 1;
End[];


{x, Date[], obj`f[1]},

{{x, 0, "x"}, 0, 10, 1, Appearance -> "Labeled"},
TrackedSymbols :> {x}
]

I also tried in the initialization section, same problem. I think this is because Manipulate itself is a Dynamic module, it does not like new context created inside it?


This is a snapshot of the above:


DynamicModule[{x = 5}, 
Begin["obj`"];

f[y_] := y^2 + 1;
End[];
{x, Date[], obj`f[1]}
]

Outside Manipulate, it works fine of course: (restating kernel helps before running this below again after the above just in case)


Begin["obj`"];
f[y_] := y^2 + 1;
End[];


obj`f[2]

gives 5



Answer



Short answer: yes, it is possible.


The problem is that parsing is done line-by-line only for the top-level code. For code inside some head(s), it is first parsed as a whole. Therefore, your f is parsed to Global`f, and this is why that symbol is used. Here is what you can do, schematically:


DynamicModule[{x = 5},
With[{def = MakeBoxes[f[y_] := y^2 + 1;], ff = MakeBoxes[f]},
Block[{$ContextPath},
BeginPackage["obj`"];

ReleaseHold[MakeExpression@ff];
Begin["`Private`"];
ReleaseHold[MakeExpression@def];
End[];
EndPackage[]]
];
{x, Date[], obj`f[1]}]

What we do here is to delay the parsing (or, more precisely, the last stage of it) of our definition until run-time, converting it first to boxes and thus preventing its premature parsing. I used a similar technique in my answer in this thread. We could have converted to strings, but I prefer boxes as being still "on this side of Mathematica".


Note that a side effect of this code is that a symbol f is still created in the context which is current when the code executes (Global` here). If you want to avoid that, you could insert Remove[f] before Block. I went all the way to use `Private` sub-context, to avoid polluting the current context with some auxiliary symbols created during assignments.



You can also automate this code with some meta-programming.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...