Skip to main content

Is there a simple way to get the Conjugate of a complex term, provided all information is available?


I've found a few threads addressing this, but they all seem to have pretty clunky answers, and it's hard to believe there's not a more elegant solution in Mathematica:


Remove annoying Conjugate


a problem about simplifing conjugate


The first thread is very clunky and I'm having trouble implementing it in a standalone function, and the 2nd solution isn't working for me, as far as I can tell.



Here's the simplest I can reduce my problem to. Let's say I have a term:


bop = Sqrt[x-2]

And I want to find the complex conjugate (CC) of it, and let's assume x is Real. I think MMa runs into problems because, depending on the value of x, the form of the CC will be pretty different. For example, if x>2, then bop is real, and the CC is just bop.


On the other hand, if x<2, then the value in the Sqrt is negative, you'd have to pull an imaginary i out of the Sqrt, and flip its sign.


Alright, so now I'm giving it all the information it should need to give me the unambiguous answer:


Assuming[x \[Element] Reals && x < 2, FullSimplify@Conjugate@bop]

Yet, this still gives me:


Conjugate[Sqrt[-2 + x]]


I'm sure I'm just missing something, but what is it? Any advice is appreciated, thank you.


edit: Alright, I solved my contrived example, by doing this:


Assuming[x \[Element] Reals && x < 2, 
Simplify@Conjugate@ComplexExpand@bop]

-I Sqrt[2 - x]

Which is good. The Simplify[] step is actually kind of vital because without it, it's comes out as a mess, even for something that simple.


Here is my actual application, which is still doing something funky. I have this term of a matrix:



t22 = 0.5 (0. + 
0.5 E^((0. + 5.14215 I) Sqrt[-2 + energy]) (1 - Sqrt[-2 + energy]/
Sqrt[energy])) (1 - Sqrt[energy]/Sqrt[-2 + energy]) +
0.5 (0. +
0.5 E^((0. - 5.14215 I) Sqrt[-2 + energy]) (1 + Sqrt[-2 + energy]/
Sqrt[energy])) (1 + Sqrt[energy]/Sqrt[-2 + energy])

Which is very ugly, unfortunately. The important things to notice are, first, it is complex, and second, there are 3 regimes of interest: energy <= 0, 0 < energy <= 2, and energy >=2.


I don't mind taking care of those three cases separately, so let's look at the simpler case of energy >= 2.


My goal is to find $|t_{22}|^2=t_{22}^*t_{22}$, which should then be a real number.



The first hurdle is getting $t_{22}^*$. Using Refine doesn't work:


Refine[Conjugate[t22], energy > 2]

gives


Conjugate[
0.5 (0. +
0.5 E^((0. + 5.14215 I) Sqrt[-2 + energy]) (1 -
Sqrt[(-2 + energy)/energy])) (1 - Sqrt[
energy/(-2 + energy)]) +
0.5 (0. +

0.5 E^((0. - 5.14215 I) Sqrt[-2 + energy]) (1 +
Sqrt[(-2 + energy)/energy])) (1 + Sqrt[energy/(-2 + energy)])]

However, it works if I stick a Simplify in there (I kind of thought that's what Refine was doing though?):


t22conj=Refine[Simplify@Conjugate[t22], energy > 2]

gives:


(E^((0. + 5.14215 I) Sqrt[-2 + energy]) (-0.5 + 0.5 energy + 
0.5 Sqrt[(-2 + energy) energy] +
E^((0. - 10.2843 I) Sqrt[-2 + energy]) (0.5 - 0.5 energy +

0.5 Sqrt[(-2 + energy) energy])))/Sqrt[(-2 + energy) energy]

Alright, now I want to find $|t_{22}|^2$. Just trying it simply leaves imaginary parts in the answer:


T = Refine[(t22conj*t22), energy > 2]

1/Sqrt[(-2+energy) energy] E^((0. +5.14215 I) Sqrt[-2+energy]) (0.5 (0. +0.5 E^((0. +5.14215 I) Sqrt[-2+energy]) (1-Sqrt[(-2+energy)/energy])) (1-Sqrt[energy/(-2+energy)])+0.5 (0. +0.5 E^((0. -5.14215 I) Sqrt[-2+energy]) (1+Sqrt[(-2+energy)/energy])) (1+Sqrt[energy/(-2+energy)])) (-0.5+0.5 energy+0.5 Sqrt[(-2+energy) energy]+E^((0. -10.2843 I) Sqrt[-2+energy]) (0.5 -0.5 energy+0.5 Sqrt[(-2+energy) energy]))

If I evaluate this at an actual value in the assumed range, the imaginary part is indeed small:


T /. energy -> 2.6 


1.3564 - 1.11022*10^-16 I

However, I'd really like a general form where I don't have to plug in a value and then take the real part (because it should already be only real). I assume this has to do with numerical precision, and that in theory something times its conjugate is real, but here, if you're even slightly off, an imaginary part will remain.


Is there any way to make this work?


thank you!




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?