Skip to main content

Intersecting parabolas in an image


I have a friend who is a math teacher (like me) and while out cycling took this picture.


parabolas


The idea would be to create the equations of the quadratics that model the bridges and super-impose them on the picture. (assuming the bridge supports ARE quadratics, but they should be "close enough" for high school...)


I have no idea what is possible with "image processing", so here is possibly a stupid question. The picture is taken from an angle, not sure what it is, but lets say about 30 degrees. I know it won't make much difference to the answer, but is there some image processing command that would skew this image to simulate the picture being taken from "the middle of the river"?


After that, I know I would use some kind of "image compose" to put together some plots of parabolas and the photo.



This question deals with that , but I'd be happy to have further input on that process.


As always, appreciate any input, I learn the most when the problem is something I am actively working on



Answer



The easiest way to do this is probably using FindGeometricTransform: For that, you'd need a number of points in a plane in the image, and their corresponding coordinates in some 2d "world" coordinate system. To illustrate, I'll pick 4 points in the image that are (more or less) the corners of a rectangle:


img = Import["http://i.stack.imgur.com/1VDdh.png"];
pts = {{419, 157}, {933, 140}, {937, 276}, {420, 259}};
LocatorPane[Dynamic[pts],
Dynamic[Show[img,
Graphics[{
{EdgeForm[Red], Transparent, Polygon[pts]},

{
Red,
MapIndexed[Text[Style[#2[[1]], 14], #1, {1, 1}] &, pts]
}
}]]]]

enter image description here


(It's hard to estimate the vanishing point in this image, so I'm not sure how accurate these points are...)


The I'll say that these points correspond to the corners of this rectangle:


width = 100;

height = 20;
ptsFlat = {{0, 0}, {width, 0}, {width, height}, {0, height}};

and let Mathematica do the real work:


{err, transform} = 
FindGeometricTransform[pts, ptsFlat,
TransformationClass -> "Perspective"]

Now transform is a function that maps points from my ptsFlat-coordinate system to image coordinates:


grid = Table[transform[{x, y}], {x, 0, width, 5}, {y, 0, height, 5}];

Show[img,
Graphics[
{
Red, Line /@ grid, Line /@ Transpose[grid]
}]]

enter image description here


You could just pass this function to ImageTransformation and "un-distort" the image:


ImageTransformation[img, transform, 800, PlotRange -> All, 
DataRange -> Full]


enter image description here


But the result isn't that spectacular: The projection is correct (at least ignoring radial distortion) for points in the same plane as the bridge, but stuff before/behind the bridge is distorted and in the wrong place. I wouldn't say that it's completely impossible to get the rest of the image projected the right way; But it'll definitely be quicker to rent a boat and take a picture from the middle of the river.


However, it's now simple enough to project our coordinate system into the image. I'll again choose 3 points on one of the bridge arcs:


ptsBridge = {{429, 163}, {646, 258}, {859, 245}};
LocatorPane[Dynamic[ptsBridge],
Dynamic[Show[img,
Graphics[{
{
Red, Point[ptsBridge],

MapIndexed[Text[Style[#2[[1]], 14], #1, {1, 1}] &, ptsBridge]
}
}]]]]

...map these to our 2d "world" coordinate system:


ptsParabola = InverseFunction[transform] /@ ptsBridge;

fit a parabola to these 3 points:


parabola = Fit[ptsParabola, {1, x, x^2}, x];


and draw that parabola into the image


parabolaPts = 
transform /@
Table[{x, parabola}, {x, Min[ptsParabola[[All, 1]]],
Max[ptsParabola[[All, 1]]], 0.1}];

Show[img,
Graphics[
{
Gray, Line /@ grid, Line /@ Transpose[grid],

Red, Point[ptsBridge],
Line[transform /@ {{#[[1]], 0}, #}] & /@ ptsParabola,
Dashed, Line[parabolaPts]
}]]

enter image description here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....