Skip to main content

How to change the variables Qi's to Ri's in one or two steps


I was wondering if there is a command in Mathematica to change all the following Qi's to Ri's? For example, change Q1 to R1, Q2 to R2, etc.


 Q1 a1 + Q2 a2 + Q3 a3 + Q4 a4 + Q5 a5 + Q6 a6 + Q7 a7 + Q8 a8 + 
Q9 a9 + Q10 a10 + Q11 a11 + Q12 a12 + Q13 a13 + Q14 a14 + Q15 a15 +
Q16 a16 + Q17 a17 + Q18 a18 + Q19 a19 + Q20 a20 + Q21 a21 + Q22 a22 +
Q23 a23 + Q24 a24 + Q25 a25 + Q26 a26 + Q27 a27 + Q28 a28 +
Q29 a29 + Q30 a30 + Q31 a31 + Q32 a32 + Q33 a33 + Q34 a34 + Q35 a35 +
Q36 a36 + Q37 a37 + Q38 a38 + Q39 a39 + Q40 a40 + Q41 a41 +

Q42 a42 + Q43 a43 + Q44 a44

I could go through and change the Qi's by hand, but I think there should be a more efficient way to do this.


Thank you.



Answer



I believe I would use:


expr = Q1 a1 + Q2 a2 + Q3 a3 + Q4 a4 + Q5 a5 + Q6 a6 + Q7 a7 + Q8 a8 +
Q9 a9 + Q10 a10 + Q11 a11 + Q12 a12 + Q13 a13 + Q14 a14 +
Q15 a15 + Q16 a16 + Q17 a17 + Q18 a18 + Q19 a19 + Q20 a20 +
Q21 a21 + Q22 a22 + Q23 a23 + Q24 a24 + Q25 a25 + Q26 a26 +

Q27 a27 + Q28 a28 + Q29 a29 + Q30 a30 + Q31 a31 + Q32 a32 +
Q33 a33 + Q34 a34 + Q35 a35 + Q36 a36 + Q37 a37 + Q38 a38 +
Q39 a39 + Q40 a40 + Q41 a41 + Q42 a42 + Q43 a43 + Q44 a44;

expr /. S_Symbol :> Symbol @ StringReplace[SymbolName@S, "Q" -> "R"]

Or more restrictively:


rule = "Q" ~~ x : DigitCharacter .. :> "R" <> x;

expr /. S_Symbol :> Symbol @ StringReplace[SymbolName@S, rule]


I feel that operating only on Symbols is cleaner and safer than converting the entire expression to and from a String.




It is not clear to me if you need this, but if you want to do the replacement after (while) Qi's are assigned values you can do it like this:


{Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, Q10, Q11, Q12} = Range@12;

expr = Hold[Q1 a1 + Q2 a2 + Q3 a3 + Q4 a4 + Q5 a5 + Q6 a6 +
Q7 a7 + Q8 a8 + Q9 a9 + Q10 a10 + Q11 a11 + Q12 a12];

expr /. S_Symbol :>

RuleCondition @ Symbol @ StringReplace[SymbolName@Unevaluated@S, "Q" -> "R"]


Hold[R1 a1 + R2 a2 + R3 a3 + R4 a4 + R5 a5 + R6 a6 +
R7 a7 + R8 a8 + R9 a9 + R10 a10 + R11 a11 + R12 a12]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?