Skip to main content

graphics - In what situation is the use of Directive required?


Sometimes I see code samples in the document or in this site using Directive, but I haven't yet find a case that Directive is necessary. Usually it can be replaced just by List (except for Graphics and Graphics3D, in which Directive can be replaced by Sequence) and their visual appearance won't change at all, though their FullForm structures will be different:


(* These samples are all modified from the examples in the document. *)

p[1] = Plot[Sin[x], {x, 0, 10}, PlotStyle -> Directive[Orange, Thick, Dashed]];
p[2] = Plot[Sin[x], {x, 0, 10}, PlotStyle -> {Orange, Thick, Dashed}];

p[2] === p[1]
p[3] =
Plot[2 Sin[x], {x, 0, 10},
Frame -> True, FrameLabel -> {x, 2 Sin[x]},
LabelStyle -> Directive[Medium, Italic]];
p[4] =
Plot[2 Sin[x], {x, 0, 10},
Frame -> True, FrameLabel -> {x, 2 Sin[x]}
LabelStyle -> {Medium, Italic}];
p[4] === p[3]

p[5] =
ParametricPlot3D[{Cos[φ] Sin[θ], Sin[φ] Sin[θ], Cos[θ]}, {φ, 0, 2 Pi}, {θ, 0, Pi},
MeshShading -> {{Directive[Red, Specularity[White, 10]],
Directive[Green, Opacity[0.5]]}, {Blue, Yellow}}];
p[6] =
ParametricPlot3D[{Cos[φ] Sin[θ], Sin[φ] Sin[θ], Cos[θ]}, {φ, 0, 2 Pi}, {θ, 0, Pi},
MeshShading -> {{{Red, Specularity[White, 10]},
{Green, Opacity[0.5]}}, {Blue, Yellow}}];
p[6] === p[5]
p[7] =

Graphics[{Purple, Arrowheads[Large], Arrow[{{4, 3/2}, {0, 3/2}, {0, 0}}]}];
p[8] =
Graphics[{Directive[Purple, Arrowheads[Large]], Arrow[{{4, 3/2}, {0, 3/2}, {0, 0}}]}];
p[8] === p[7]
p[9] =
Graphics3D[
Directive[Black, Thick, Dashed],
Line[{{-2, 0, 2}, {2, 0, 2}, {0, 0, 4}, {-2, 0, 2}}]}];
p[10] =
Graphics3D[{Black, Thick, Dashed,

Line[{{-2, 0, 2}, {2, 0, 2}, {0, 0, 4}, {-2, 0, 2}}]}];
p[10] === p[9]
Grid[Partition[p[#] & /@ Range@10, 2]]


False
False
False
False
False




enter image description here


Directive was added in version 6, so its existence can't be a issue left over by history, so what's the significance of Directive? Is there a case where Directive is required? Does Directive give any advantage over List or Sequence that I haven't noticed?



Answer



Directive denotes a single compound graphics directive, which idea cannot otherwise be expressed, although the same effect can often be attained through multiple paths. But then again, Mathematica offers multiple paths for many computations.


In a document one can define styles such as


myStyle = Directive[Thick, Blue, Opacity[0.5]]

and use them equally in Plot, Graphics etc. without having to apply Sequence or some other workaround. In other words, if you think of the directives as a single style, you can write what you mean.


Another thing is that Directive[..] does not have the head List, which can be an advantage in postprocessing graphics.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...