Skip to main content

gathering - binning list of lists in unequal bin lengths


I'm lookin for binning of


list1={{"1A",1},{"2A",2},{"170A",170},{"3A",3},{"90A",90},{"80A",80},{"2A",2},{"110A",110},{"222A",222},{"200A",200},{"215A",215},{"30A",30}}


into


bins={{0,20,100,∞}}

according to 2nd element in sublists as bin criterion?



Answer



I think this should work for you:


binBy1[dat_, bins_, fn_] :=
With[{intv = Interval /@ Partition[bins, 2, 1]},
dat //

GroupBy[IntervalMemberQ[intv, fn@#] &] //
KeyMap[Pick[intv, #][[1, 1]] & ] //
KeySort
]

Use:


binBy1[list1, {0, 20, 100, ∞}, Last]


<|{0, 20} -> {{"1A", 1}, {"2A", 2}, {"3A", 3}, {"2A", 2}},

{20, 100} -> {{"90A", 90}, {"80A", 80}, {"30A", 30}},
{100, ∞} -> {{"170A", 170}, {"110A", 110}, {"222A", 222},
{"200A", 200}, {"215A", 215}}|>

If you just want the values:


binBy2[dat_, bins_, fn_] :=
With[{intv = Interval /@ Partition[bins, 2, 1]},
dat //
GroupBy[IntervalMemberQ[intv, fn@#] &] //
KeyMap[Pick[intv, #][[1]] & ] //

Lookup[#, intv, {}] &
]

binBy2[{ {"90A", 90}, {"3A", 3}}, {-50, 0, 20, 100, ∞}, Last]


{{}, {{"3A", 3}}, {{"90A", 90}}, {}}



Performance



This ends up less clean than the code above, which you already feel is complicated, but for performance Interpolation can be far superior to IntervalMemberQ as I used it above.


binsToIFn[bins_List] :=
Interpolation[{Join[{$MinMachineNumber}, bins, {$MaxMachineNumber}],
Range[0, Length@bins + 1]}\[Transpose], InterpolationOrder -> 0]

binBy3[dat_, bins_, fn_] :=
With[{IFn = binsToIFn @ bins},
dat //
GroupBy[IFn @* fn] //
KeyMap[Round] //

Lookup[#, Range[Length@bins + 1], {}] &
]

Note that with this function $MinMachineNumber and $MaxMachineNumber are automatically used as the bounding intervals so they may be omitted from the list.


Timings compared to my first two functions on a large problem:


bins = Union @ RandomInteger[999, 300];
bins = Join[{-10}, bins, {1200}];

big = RandomReal[999, {50000, 2}];


binBy1[big, bins, Last] // Length // Timing
binBy2[big, bins, Last] // Length // Timing
binBy3[big, bins, Last] // Length // Timing


{5.63164, 269}

{5.60044, 269}

{0.109201, 271}


Coolwater's function on my machine:


binBy[big, {bins}] // Length // Timing


{9.36006, 269}

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?