Skip to main content

debugging - Automatically add debug contents to a program


Sometimes I'll use Print[1] or Print[n] to debug in a long loop, but it's really a boring job to add these sentence by sentence and removing them sentence by sentence. (It's already boring to read this first three lines sentence by sentence so you can imagine how boring it is to add these stuff sentence by sentence. :P) So my question is how to throw this job to a program?


Let's take this small (and stupid) program as an example:


Do[j=i^2;Thread[{{1},{2,3}}],{i,3}]

I would like to add two Print in this program to determin where the problem occurs.


Do[Print@1;j=i^2;Print@2;Thread[{{1},{2,3}}],{i,3}]

In this way I can know that it's the second step that goes wrong.



Any idea how to do this automatically?



Answer



Yesterday I checked my account's question list again and find this question lying inside. After a year wrestling mostly with Hold stuffs, I think I finally found a, well, not that elegant solution. Any suggestions or new answers are surely welcomed!!!


It seems that this question is not that bad, actually I may say that It's quite hard for one to solve this problem using all sorts of evaluation manipulation techniques. and it has real applications sometimes.




As usual, my code first:


SetAttributes[adddebug, HoldFirst]
adddebug[orig_, func_: Echo, level_: {2}] :=
Module[{$count = 1, tempf},
Replace[

Replace[Hold[orig], HoldPattern[CompoundExpression[comp__]] :>
Block[{},
tempf @@
Riffle[List @@ (Hold /@ Hold[comp]),
With[{$func = func, q = #}, Hold@$func@q] & /@
Range[$count, ($count = $count + Length@Hold[comp] + 1) -
1], {2, -1, 2}] /; True],level],
tempf[seg__] :>
Block[{},
tempf[Hold[CompoundExpression]] @@ (tempf /@ {seg}) /; True],level] /. tempf[Hold[seg_]] :> seg

]

adddebug[Do[j = i^2; Thread[{{1}, {2, 3}}], {i, 3}]]

The result is satisfying



Hold[Do[j = i^2; Echo[1]; Thread[{{1}, {2, 3}}]; Echo[2], {i, 3}]]





Some additional notes:



Why I say this question is not that trivial is because I should protect CompoundExpression and its content from evaluating while still need to operate on CompoundExpression's structure and use in place evaluation techniques extensively.


So I install protection in the following ways:




  1. When pattern-matching, Use HoldPattern




  2. Use unique symbol tempf as a medium to mark Where CompoundExpression previoulsly existed. Use tempf[Hold[CompoundExpression]].





  3. make every element of CompoundExpression Hold at all times, and mark them using tempf[Hold[expr]]




  4. I'm quite satisfied by the last ReplaceAll's design, as previously I’ve already make where should be CompoundExpression tempf[Hold[CompoundExpression]] and where should be CompoundExpression's element tempf[Hold[element]], Now I can safely use ReplaceAll once to make those stuffs back to their original form!






I still am looking foward to a better solution, so if anyone has any idea, post something, Thanks!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...