Skip to main content

Compile, "global variables" and recursion


I am trying to do something similar to this, namely to make a Compile'd function outer that itself calls a Compile'd function inner which accesses a variable defined in outer. Copy-pasting the example Leonid gives in the link, I get no errors. However in my case, I want inner to be a recursive function.


So far I have tried (the functions are toy examples):


Clear[inner];
inner = Compile[ {{i, _Integer}, {j, _Integer}},
If[i >= j, Return[], AppendTo[bag, list]; inner[i + 1, j]];
,CompilationOptions -> {"InlineExternalDefinitions" -> True,
"InlineCompiledFunctions" -> False} ]

and



Clear[outer];
outer = Compile[{{i, _Integer}},
Block[{list = Table[{0, 0}, {i}], bag},
bag = {list};
inner[1, i];
bag
]
, CompilationOptions -> {"InlineExternalDefinitions" -> True,
"InlineCompiledFunctions" -> True}
]


Trying to execute this last piece results in the error message:


Compile::cret : The type of return values in (...) are different.
Evaluation will use the uncompiled function.

I have a hard time interpreting the output of CompilePrint in this case, so I cannot pinpoint the error in order to move further with this. Since I am able to create compiled recursive functions just fine in general, and the link provides a "hack" to make inner see the variables in outer, I think it should be possible to do this, but perhaps not...


EDIT: I have verified that the lingering MainEvaluate is not due AppendTo or some-such, by making the function inner even more basic. I have also tried all possible combinations of True/False for the CompilationOptions for both inner and outer with no success. So it seems to me that it's possible to compile either a recursive function, or a compiled function modifying a "global" variable when called from another compiled function, but not both =(




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.