Skip to main content

plotting - How to combine option settings in multiple plots such as Epilog/Prolog?



Suppose you have a program that produces plots. Later a user wishes to combine some of them with Show. The options in the first plot will override the options in the second plot (see Plot Option Precedence while combining Plots with Show[]). This is particularly unfortunate with options whose settings can be concatenated, such as Prolog and Epilog.


Is there some convenient way to combine such plots and at the same time combine the settings for options that can be meaningfully concatenated, such as Prolog and Epilog?


Example. Given the two plots:


plot1 = Plot[Sin[x], {x, -Pi, Pi},
Prolog -> {Red, Disk[{Pi/2, 0}]},
Epilog -> {Purple, Thickness[0.05], Line[{{-Pi, 1/2}, {Pi, 1/2}}]}
]
plot2 = Plot[Cos[x], {x, -Pi, Pi},
Prolog -> {Yellow, Disk[]},
Epilog -> {Green, Thickness[0.05], Line[{{-Pi, -1/2}, {Pi, -1/2}}]}

]

The combined output should look like this:


Mathematica graphics



Answer



Here is a method based on an earlier answer of mine, with extensions.


grPat = (gr : #) | {gr : #} &[(_Graphics | _Graphics3D) ..];

mergeOp[gr__][(op_ -> fn_) | op_] :=
op -> (#& @* fn) @ Lookup[Options /@ {gr}, op, ## &[]]


combineShow[grPat, opts_List: {Prolog, Epilog}] := Show[gr, mergeOp[gr] /@ opts]

combineShow[opts_List][grPat] := combineShow[gr, opts]

Basic usage defaulting to {Prolog, Epilog} for the options to combine:


combineShow[plot1, plot2]

enter image description here


Combine only Epilog:



combineShow[plot1, plot2, {Epilog}]

enter image description here


The default combination operator (List) works for some options but not all. Consider the case of PlotRange:


plot3 = Show[plot1, PlotRange -> {{0, Pi}, {-1, 1}}]
plot4 = Show[plot2, PlotRange -> {{-Pi, 0}, {-1, 1}}]

enter image description here


To get the complete graphic we need to combine the PlotRange values in a particular way, and that can be specified like this:


combineShow[plot3, plot4, {Prolog, Epilog, PlotRange -> Map[MinMax]@*Thread}]


enter image description here


Note:



  • Map[MinMax]@*Thread only works with complete PlotRange values; it would fail on PlotRange -> All for example. I did not mean to present this as a robust way to combine PlotRange values, rather as an example of the use of my combineShow function.


combineShow is written to also work in postfix notation:


{plot1, plot2} // combineShow

{plot1, plot2} // combineShow[{Epilog}]


{plot3, plot4} // combineShow[{Prolog, Epilog, PlotRange -> Map[MinMax]@*Thread}]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...