Skip to main content

calculus and analysis - Derivative of piecewise function


I tried to find f(0) of this function:


f(x)={xsin(1x)if x00if x=0


This is what I tried in Mathematica:


f[x_] = Piecewise[{{x*Sin[1/x], x != 0}, {0, x == 0}}]
f'[0]


Mathematica gives the answer 0, while the answer should be undefined, also see this discussion: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1551257/derivative-of-piece-wise-function-at-x-0


Any idea why Mathematica doesn't give the correct anwer?



Answer



Mathematica is being inconsistent in how it is treating the derivative for a piecewise function (this seems like a bug to me). We can look at a simpler example to see this, which will point towards a workaround,


pwf1[x_] := Piecewise[{
{3 x, x != 0},
{5 x, x == 0}}];
pwf2[x_] := Piecewise[{
{3 x, x < 0},

{5 x, x == 0},
{3 x, x > 0}}];
pwf1'[0]
pwf2'[0]
(* 5 *)
(* 3 *)

These are both the same function, and if we take the derivative manually, then we get the same answer:


Limit[(pwf1[0 + h] - pwf1[0])/h, h -> 0]
Limit[(pwf2[0 + h] - pwf2[0])/h, h -> 0]

(* 3 *)
(* 3 *)

So apparently it is better to define the piecewise regions more explicitly,


f[x_] := Piecewise[{
{x*Sin[1/x], x > 0},
{0, x == 0},
{x*Sin[1/x], x < 0}
}]
f'[0]

(* Indeterminate *)

This is the same answer you get when you take the analytic derivative and substitute x=0,


func[x_] := x Sin[1/x];
func'[0]


During evaluation of In[149]:= Power::infy: Infinite expression 1/0 encountered. >>


During evaluation of In[149]:= Power::infy: Infinite expression 1/0 encountered. >>


During evaluation of In[149]:= Power::infy: Infinite expression 1/0 encountered. >>



During evaluation of In[149]:= General::stop: Further output of Power::infy will be suppressed during this calculation. >>



(* Indeterminate *)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...