Skip to main content

differential equations - NDSolve's output ignores multiple valid solutions


I'm looking for solutions to a boundary problem involving a non-linear Hamiltonian $$ H(q,p) = \frac{1}{4}\left(q^{2}+p^{2}\right)^{2}, $$ whose solutions are oscillatory but have a complex time dependence. I'm interested in all possible solutions $\left(q(t),p(t)\right)$ that satisfy the following boundary conditions:


$$\begin{cases} q(0)&=-1 \\ q(\pi)&=1 \end{cases}$$


and I am absolutely sure there are a lot (maybe an infinity) of them. When I ask Mathematica to solve the boundary problem


NDSolve[{q'[t] == p[t] (p[t]^2 + q[t]^2), 
p'[t] == -q[t] (p[t]^2 + q[t]^2), q[0] == -1, q[Pi] == 1}, q[t], {t, 0, Pi}]


I get only one solution, which looks like


enter image description here


and satisfies the boundary problem. What I can't figure out is that, manually, I found another solution:


 NDSolve[{q'[t] == p[t] (p[t]^2 + q[t]^2), 
p'[t] == -q[t] (p[t]^2 + q[t]^2), q[0] == -1, p[0] == 1.200859},
q[t], {t, 0, Pi}]

whose graph is


enter image description here .


How can I manipulate NDSolve such that it displays more solutions? Since they may be infinite, not all can be displayed, but why is Mathematica just choosing a particular solution in a set of infinite ones?




Answer



Update


You seem correct QuantumBrick that the Shooting method is better:


sols = Map[First[
NDSolve[{q'[t] == p[t] (p[t]^2 + q[t]^2),
p'[t] == -q[t] (p[t]^2 + q[t]^2),
q[0] == -1, q[Pi] == 1}, {q, p}, {t, 0, Pi},
Method -> "BoundaryValues" -> {"Shooting",
"StartingInitialConditions" -> {p[0] == #}}]] &, Range[0.25, 2, 0.25]];


Plot[Evaluate[q[t] /. sols], {t, 0, Pi}]

enter image description here




Introducing small error into the starting conditions to find other approximate answers (which is similar to your manual answer)


sol = Table[
NDSolve[{q'[t] == p[t] (p[t]^2 + q[t]^2),
p'[t] == -q[t] (p[t]^2 + q[t]^2),
q[0] == -RandomReal[{0.99, 1.01}],
q[Pi] == RandomReal[{0.99, 1.01}]}, q, {t, 0, Pi}], {10}];


Plot[Table[q[t] /. sol[[i]], {i, 1, 10}], {t, 0, Pi}]

enter image description here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.