Skip to main content

calculus and analysis - Using DSolve to solve an integral equation


I've the following integral (or DE) that I need to solve (for $x(t)$ and all the constants are known, real and positive):


$$k\cdot\theta\left(t-m\right)+(n-k)\cdot\theta\left(t-v\right)=$$ $$x(t)\cdot\text{a}+\text{b}\cdot\ln\left(1+\frac{x(t)}{\text{c}}\right)+\int_0^tx(\tau)\cdot\mathcal{L}_\text{s}^{-1}\left\{\frac{1}{\frac{1}{f+sl}+\frac{s}{qs+p}}\right\}_{\left(t-\tau\right)}\space\text{d}\tau\tag1$$


I tried solving the equation with


DSolve[

{x[t]*a + b*Log[1 + ((x[t])/c)] +
Integrate[
x[τ] *
(InverseLaplaceTransform[1/((1/(f + s*l)) + (1/(s/(q*s + p)))), s, t - τ]),
{τ,0,t}] ==
k*HeavisideTheta[t - m] + (n - k)*HeavisideTheta[t - v],
x[0]==0, x'[0] == 0}, {x[t]}, {t}]

But it gives error messages. Is there a way in Mathematica to solve this integral/DE equation?



Answer




The following is a possible numeric solution, the key idea is simple: calculate the inverse Laplace transform symbolically first, then discretize the outer integral with right Riemann sum formula. (I know this formula is relatively rough, but given the upper limit is a variable, I'm not aware of better solution. )


We first substitute parameters into the equation and calculate Laplace inversion. Parameters are all set to 1 as suggested by OP in the comment. I've introduced 2 symbols int and inverse instead of Integrate and InverseLaplaceTransform to avoid unnecessary symbolic calculation, and use UnitStep to replace HeavisideTheta because it's more convenient for numeric calculation later.


eq = x[t] a + b Log[1 + x[t]/c] + int[x[τ] inverse[
1/(1/(f + s l) + 1/(s/(q s + p))), s, t - τ], {τ, 0, t}] ==
k HeavisideTheta[t - m] + (n - k) HeavisideTheta[t - v] /.
a | b | c | f | k | l | m | n | p | q | v -> 1 /. HeavisideTheta -> UnitStep /.
inverse -> InverseLaplaceTransform // Simplify

(*
int[((E^(-(1/2) (3 + Sqrt[5]) t -

1/2 (-3 + Sqrt[5]) τ) (-(-2 + Sqrt[5]) E^(Sqrt[5] t) - (2 + Sqrt[5]) E^(
Sqrt[5] τ)))/Sqrt[5] + DiracDelta[t - τ]) x[τ], {τ, 0,
t}] + Log[1 + x[t]] + x[t] == UnitStep[-1 + t]
*)

Since


Assuming[{t >= 0}, Integrate[DiracDelta[t - τ] x[τ], {τ, 0, t}]]
(* x[t] *)

The equation can be further simplified to



eq = eq /. DiracDelta[_] :> 0 /. int[a__] :> int@a + x[t]
(* int[(
E^(-(1/2) (3 + Sqrt[5]) t -
1/2 (-3 + Sqrt[5]) τ) (-(-2 + Sqrt[5]) E^(Sqrt[5] t) - (2 + Sqrt[5]) E^(
Sqrt[5] τ)) x[τ])/Sqrt[5], {τ, 0, t}] + Log[1 + x[t]] + 2 x[t] ==
UnitStep[-1 + t] *)

Then we define function for calculating right Riemann sum:


int[expr_, {t_, L_, R_, step_}] := step Total@Table[expr, {t, L + step, R, step}]


Finally, discretize the integral equation to a set of nonlinear algebraic equation and solve it with FindRoot:


step = 1/50;
bL = 0; bR = 2;
eqset = Table[eq, {t, bL, bR, step}] /. {τ, bL, a_} :> {τ, bL, a, step};
initial[t_] := 0;
sollst = FindRoot[eqset, Table[{x@t, initial@t}, {t, bL, bR, step}]][[All, -1]];
ListLinePlot[sollst, PlotRange -> All, DataRange -> {bL, bR}]

Mathematica graphics


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....