Skip to main content

calculus and analysis - Using DSolve to solve an integral equation


I've the following integral (or DE) that I need to solve (for x(t) and all the constants are known, real and positive):


kθ(tm)+(nk)θ(tv)=

x(t)a+bln(1+x(t)c)+t0x(τ)L1s{11f+sl+sqs+p}(tτ) dτ


I tried solving the equation with


DSolve[

{x[t]*a + b*Log[1 + ((x[t])/c)] +
Integrate[
x[τ] *
(InverseLaplaceTransform[1/((1/(f + s*l)) + (1/(s/(q*s + p)))), s, t - τ]),
{τ,0,t}] ==
k*HeavisideTheta[t - m] + (n - k)*HeavisideTheta[t - v],
x[0]==0, x'[0] == 0}, {x[t]}, {t}]

But it gives error messages. Is there a way in Mathematica to solve this integral/DE equation?



Answer




The following is a possible numeric solution, the key idea is simple: calculate the inverse Laplace transform symbolically first, then discretize the outer integral with right Riemann sum formula. (I know this formula is relatively rough, but given the upper limit is a variable, I'm not aware of better solution. )


We first substitute parameters into the equation and calculate Laplace inversion. Parameters are all set to 1 as suggested by OP in the comment. I've introduced 2 symbols int and inverse instead of Integrate and InverseLaplaceTransform to avoid unnecessary symbolic calculation, and use UnitStep to replace HeavisideTheta because it's more convenient for numeric calculation later.


eq = x[t] a + b Log[1 + x[t]/c] + int[x[τ] inverse[
1/(1/(f + s l) + 1/(s/(q s + p))), s, t - τ], {τ, 0, t}] ==
k HeavisideTheta[t - m] + (n - k) HeavisideTheta[t - v] /.
a | b | c | f | k | l | m | n | p | q | v -> 1 /. HeavisideTheta -> UnitStep /.
inverse -> InverseLaplaceTransform // Simplify

(*
int[((E^(-(1/2) (3 + Sqrt[5]) t -

1/2 (-3 + Sqrt[5]) τ) (-(-2 + Sqrt[5]) E^(Sqrt[5] t) - (2 + Sqrt[5]) E^(
Sqrt[5] τ)))/Sqrt[5] + DiracDelta[t - τ]) x[τ], {τ, 0,
t}] + Log[1 + x[t]] + x[t] == UnitStep[-1 + t]
*)

Since


Assuming[{t >= 0}, Integrate[DiracDelta[t - τ] x[τ], {τ, 0, t}]]
(* x[t] *)

The equation can be further simplified to



eq = eq /. DiracDelta[_] :> 0 /. int[a__] :> int@a + x[t]
(* int[(
E^(-(1/2) (3 + Sqrt[5]) t -
1/2 (-3 + Sqrt[5]) τ) (-(-2 + Sqrt[5]) E^(Sqrt[5] t) - (2 + Sqrt[5]) E^(
Sqrt[5] τ)) x[τ])/Sqrt[5], {τ, 0, t}] + Log[1 + x[t]] + 2 x[t] ==
UnitStep[-1 + t] *)

Then we define function for calculating right Riemann sum:


int[expr_, {t_, L_, R_, step_}] := step Total@Table[expr, {t, L + step, R, step}]


Finally, discretize the integral equation to a set of nonlinear algebraic equation and solve it with FindRoot:


step = 1/50;
bL = 0; bR = 2;
eqset = Table[eq, {t, bL, bR, step}] /. {τ, bL, a_} :> {τ, bL, a, step};
initial[t_] := 0;
sollst = FindRoot[eqset, Table[{x@t, initial@t}, {t, bL, bR, step}]][[All, -1]];
ListLinePlot[sollst, PlotRange -> All, DataRange -> {bL, bR}]

Mathematica graphics


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...