Skip to main content

equation solving - How to write Newton-Raphson module and return a value?


I am writing a code which solve nonlinear algebraic systems via Newton-Raphson algorithm. I want to make a Newton Module with another file and use the Module in my test file, but i didn't achieve it. Because, If the method is not converged, I break the code and return "not converged". Hence, iteration is not continuing and my code is not working properly. Here is my code:


F[y1_,y2_] = {
((y1 - 11)^2 / 64) - ((y2-7)^2/100) -1,
(y1-3)^2 + (y2-1)^2 -400
}; (*Define nonlinear algebraic system vector *)

J[y1_,y2_] = Outer[D,F[y1,y2],{y1,y2}]; (* Find symbolic jacobian *)


{y10,y20}= {20,-4}; (* Initial values for newton iterations *)

Tol   = 10^-12;
counter = 0; (*How many newton iterations*)
DeltaY = {0.1,0.1};
MaxIter = 50;
list  = Table[{0,0},{i,1,MaxIter}];
(* Begin loop for newton iterations *)
i=1;

While[Norm[ DeltaY, 2] > Tol,
    Result = Solve[J[y10,y20].{{dy1},{dy2}}==-F[y10,y20],{dy1,dy2}] //N //Flatten ;  (*Solve linear system for Delta y *)
    DeltaY = {dy1,dy2}/.Result;
    {y10,y20} = {y10,y20} + DeltaY; (*Find new Y values with computed delta y solutions *)
    list[[i]] = {y10,y20}; (* Append new computed Y elements into list array *)
    Print[list[[i]]," and error:",DeltaY]       
    Print[Norm[ DeltaY, Infinity]]
    If[i>MaxIter,Print["Not converged"] Return[{0,0}];]
counter++
i++;

] //AbsoluteTiming

How can I make n dimensional newton iteration module without breaking code. Also how to return a value with a module.


Note: I will use my newton module for some implicit numerical schemes.


Best regards.



Answer



The simplest code to create your module is


nr[func_, jac_, y1_, y2_, MaxIter_, Tol_] := 
 Module[{y10 = y1, y20 = y2, counter = 0, DeltaY = {0.1, 0.1}, 
   list = Table[{0, 0}, {i, 1, MaxIter}], i = 1},

  While[Norm[DeltaY, 2] > Tol, 
   Result = Solve[jac[y10, y20].{{dy1}, {dy2}} == -func[y10, y20], {dy1, 
        dy2}] // N // Flatten;
   DeltaY = {dy1, dy2} /. Result;
   {y10, y20} = {y10, y20} + DeltaY;
   list[[i]] = {y10, y20};
   Print[list[[i]], " and error:", DeltaY, "  ", i, "  ", counter] ;
   Print[Norm[DeltaY, Infinity]]; 
   If[i > MaxIter, Print["Not converged"] Return[{0, 0}];] ;
   counter++ ;

   i++;]; {y10, y20}]

Call it with


nr[F, J, y10, y20, MaxIter, Tol]

and it will produce the Print statements produced by the code in your question, plus the answer, {22.519, -3.35977}. Of course, your final product should contain options, documentation, additional error checks, and the like. Hope this helps.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...
Post a Comment
Read more