Skip to main content

plotting - How do I create a triangulated surface from points?


I have a set of points in a nx3 matrix and I would like to convert them into a surface, so that I may calculate its surface area.


The function ListSurfacePlot3D creates the surface how I want it. How do I compute the surface area from there? enter image description here


I have tried other functions, such as DelaunayMesh. However, DelaunayMesh creates a closed region defining a volume, causing the surface area to be greater than expected. Which function do I use? If this surface is created correctly, I would use RegionMeasure to get the area. enter image description here


Edit: Here is my set of data points https://www.dropbox.com/s/db79ewahx24it3r/Data.txt?dl=0


Using Geomagic Control allows me to get the area of the wrapped points, at about 11522 mm2. I don't need the visual, I only want the area from these points. enter image description here


I'll be running the area calculation through a routine of about 6000 samples.



Answer




It turns out ListSurfacePlot3D does a terribly poor job of approximating the surface in the OP, otherwise one will just apply DiscretizeGraphics to the output obtained from ListSurfacePlot3D and be done with it. But since that's not applicable here, we present an approach that uses alpha shapes to approximate the shape of the given point set by tuning a parameter. First a helper function for computing the circum-radius of a tetrahedron (we Compile it and give it the Listable Attribute for speed gains):


circumRadius = 
Compile[{{v, _Real, 2}},
With[{a = v[[1]] - v[[4]], b = v[[2]] - v[[4]], c = v[[3]] - v[[4]]},
With[{a1 = Plus @@ (a^2), b1 = Plus @@ (b^2), c1 = Plus @@ (c^2),
α1 = b[[2]] c[[3]] - b[[3]] c[[2]],
α2 = b[[3]] c[[1]] - b[[1]] c[[3]],
α3 = b[[1]] c[[2]] - b[[2]] c[[1]],
β1 = c[[2]] a[[3]] - c[[3]] a[[2]],
β2 = c[[3]] a[[1]] - c[[1]] a[[3]],

β3 = c[[1]] a[[2]] - c[[2]] a[[1]],
γ1 = a[[2]] b[[3]] - a[[3]] b[[2]],
γ2 = a[[3]] b[[1]] - a[[1]] b[[3]],
γ3 = a[[1]] b[[2]] - a[[2]] b[[1]]},
Norm[a1 {α1, α2, α3} + b1 {β1, β2, β3} + c1 {γ1, γ2, γ3}] /
(2 Norm[Plus @@ (a[[1 ;; 3]] {α1, α2, α3})])]
],
CompilationTarget -> "C", RuntimeOptions -> "Speed",
RuntimeAttributes -> {Listable}, Parallelization -> True]


And now the code to compute the alpha shape:


alphaShapes[points_, crit_] := 
Module[{alphacriteria, del = Quiet @ DelaunayMesh @ points, tetras,
tetcoords, tetradii, selectExternalFaces},
alphacriteria[tetrahedra_, radii_, rmax_] :=
Pick[tetrahedra, UnitStep @ Subtract[rmax, radii], 1];
selectExternalFaces[facets_] := MeshRegion[points, facets];
If[Head[del] === EmptyRegion, del,
tetras = MeshCells[del, 3];
tetcoords = MeshPrimitives[del, 3][[All, 1]];

tetradii = Quiet@circumRadius@tetcoords /. ComplexInfinity -> $MaxMachineNumber;
selectExternalFaces @ alphacriteria[tetras, tetradii, crit]
]
]

For the plot, setting crit to $45$ seems to do a good job, but there appear to be holes in the surface. The area appears to be close to the value posted by OP from Geomagic.


reg = RegionBoundary @ alphaShapes[data, 45]; (* data is your nx3 matrix *)
HighlightMesh[reg, {Style[2, FaceForm[None]], Style[1, Darker@Green]}]

Mathematica graphics



Here is the approximate area:


0.5 Area @ reg


11612.



Which is very close to 11522 (the value provided by the OP). Note that I'm dividing the total area by $2$ since the Area function will compute the areas of the cells on both sides of the image.


For the Image Gurus here:


I would like to know if Mathematica can produce something as nice as the image posted in the question obtained from GeoImage.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.