Skip to main content

plotting - how to restrict the tick options to finite number of major and minor ticks



When you plot a data using Listplot, use the following


data=Uncompress[FromCharacterCode@ Flatten[ImageData[Import["https://i.stack.imgur.com/OiZrp.png"],"Byte"]]] ListPlot[data,Plotrange->Full,Framellabel->{"Length",""},LabelStyle->{FontSize->19},PlotTheme->"Classic",Frame->True,Joined->True,ImageSize->Large,PlotStyle->{Black}]


enter image description here


Then we get a neat graph like this, however, this is not a neat image for any scientific publications, For that, we need to fix Major ticks and minor ticks to a minimum, otherwise, all those minor ticks would distract the attention.


One solution is to write manually, but that is a herculean process. but if you use some other graph plotting softwares, They have the options to control minor ticks and Major ticks.


I am certain that Mathematica also has.Could anyone give me a nice way to control the minor ticks and Major ticks?


For example, in the x-axis, I just need one minor tick in between two major ticks.and y-axis I also need three Major ticks such as 0.35,0.45,0.55 and 0.4 and 0.5 as minor ticks


Comments and previous questions


1) I also have refereed some of the Mathematica questions.


here, where they use Finddivison method, but that would not work here in my y axis, all other minor option does not look very neat.



2) I always need inward ticks.


3) please let me also know, if someone uses Mathematica for publishing scientific papers, how do you make a neat image. Any suggestions for fonts or size of the image etc are welcome.



Answer



Fine-tune to your needs:


bigTicks = Table[{x, x, {.05, 0}}, {x, 50., 50.5, .1}];
littleTicks = Table[{x, x, {.02, 0}}, {x, 50.05, 50.55, .1}];
Plot[1, {x, 50, 50.5},
Ticks -> {Union[bigTicks, littleTicks], Automatic}]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...