Skip to main content

numerics - Is it possible to use the LevenbergMarquardt algorithm for fitting a black-box residual function?


I have a black-box multiargument multiparametric function of the type SRD[dataPoint_List,params_List] which accepts experimental data along with the parameters of the model and returns a vector with the first element being the squared relative deviation (SRD) between the computed model value and experimental value for the given data point and the rest of the elements being the gradient of the SRD in the given point with respect to params. I wish to minimize the sum Sum[First[SRD[dataPoint, params]], {dataPoint, dataPoints}] with respect to params using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm and the computed gradient of SRD with respect to params (equal to Sum[Rest[SRD[dataPoint, params]], {dataPoint, dataPoints}]). What is the best way to do this in Mathematica?



Answer



Here is the solution based on Faysal's code:


steps=0; 
FindMinimum[Null,

{optimVariables, initialGuess}\[Transpose],
Method -> {"LevenbergMarquardt",
"Residual" -> Sqrt[2] residualVector[optimVariables],
"Jacobian" -> {Sqrt[2] jacobianMatrix[optimVariables], EvaluationMonitor :> ++steps},
"StepControl" -> {"TrustRegion", "StartingScaledStepSize" -> 1/1000, "MaxScaledStepSize" -> 1/10, "AcceptableStepRatio" -> 1/3}}]

Note that it is recommended to use exact numbers for the parameters of the "TrustRegion" method because these parameters are used inside of the algorithm without any check for consistency with WorkingPrecision. I should also note that the actual residual vector and jacobian must be multiplied by Sqrt[2] for having FindMinimum returning the minimum equal to


residualVector[optimVariables].residualVector[optimVariables]

and not to



residualVector[optimVariables].residualVector[optimVariables]/2

as it is by default.


The jacobian may be calculated automatically by the following code:


jacobianMatrix[_] = D[residualVector[optimVariables], {optimVariables}]

One can restrict the jacobian to be evaluated for numerical values only by defining it as:


jacobianMatrix[_List?(VectorQ[#, NumberQ] &)] = 
D[residualVector[optimVariables], {optimVariables}]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....