plotting - PlotLegends "Expressions" default for ListPlot?

gwr pointed out an apparent problem with setting a default Option value of PlotLegends for DateListPlot. I traced the problem to the existence of PlotLegends -> "Expressions" in the default PlotTheme. This is true for ListPlot as well. Since the explicit options within the Plot Theme override options set with SetOptions it appears that our option is ignored.

Actually "Expressions" is used across many Themes for ListPlot:

PlotLegends /. Charting`ResolvePlotTheme["Default", ListPlot] & /@
  {"Default", "Web", "Classic", "Detailed", "Scientific"}

{"Expressions", "Expressions", "Expressions", "Expressions", "Expressions"}

Why would this be? This option value doesn't seem to even work with these plot types, i.e.

dat = Table[{k, PDF[BinomialDistribution[50, p], k]}, {p, {0.3, 0.5, 0.8}}, {k, 0, 50}];

ListPlot[dat, Filling -> Axis, PlotLegends -> "Expressions"]

However it does cause the Themes to ignore a manually set default PlotLegends value:

SetOptions[ListPlot, PlotLegends -> PointLegend[Automatic, {"one", "two", "three"}]];

ListPlot[dat, Filling -> Axis]

Observe that turning off the Plot Theme causes the legend to suddenly appear:

 ListPlot[dat, Filling -> Axis, PlotTheme -> None]

Unless PlotLegends -> "Expressions" has some desirable effect I have failed to observe this seems like plainly undesirable behavior. Was the inclusion of PlotLegends -> "Expressions" in the Themes for ListPlot and related functions a mistake?

(All observations made in Mathematica 10.1.0 under Windows.)

Answer

"Expressions" for legend in ListPlot family is used because of Association. With Association input, the plot will automatically pick up the keys as legends. Here is an example:

ListPlot[<|"A"->{1,2,3},"B"->{2,3,4}|>]

SetOptions is to set the default values to options but it doesn't guarantee that the settings will be used by the plot since PlotTheme has been introduced.

The workaround would be to pack a set of options you would like to use through out the session in a variable and use it instead of using SetOptions.

Comments

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.

Blog

Search This Blog