Skip to main content

numerical integration - Meniscus outside of a cylinder - axisymmetric Young-Laplace equation in semi-infinite domain


How to solve the axisymmetric Young-Laplace equation


$$\frac{z'(r)}{r \sqrt{z'(r)^2+1}}+\frac{z''(r)}{\left(z'(r)^2+1\right)^{3/2}}=z(r)$$


with b.c.s


$$z'(1)=-2$$$$z'(\infty)=0$$


where $z=Z/l_c$ and $r=R/l_c$ are dimensionless height and radius, $Z$, $R$ are the corresponding real height and radius, $l_c=\sqrt{\frac{\gamma }{g \rho }}$ is capillary length, $\gamma$ is surface tension, $g$ is the acceleration of gravity and $\rho$ is the density difference between phases. The solution of the problem describes the shape of meniscus outside of a cylinder, how can I obtain it with NDSolve?



Answer






Because of an arguable backslide around v11, the code pieces for sol1 and sol3 are broken since then. I haven't yet found a easy workaround.


Luckily, core parts of this answer i.e. those about solnew are not influenced.



The most direct solution for the problem seems to be approximating the b.c. at infinity with a b.c. that's just far enough e.g.


$$z'(10)\approx z'(\infty)=0$$


and it's indeed applicable:


eq = z''[r]/(1 + z'[r]^2)^(3/2) + z'[r]/(r (Sqrt[1 + z'[r]^2])) == z[r];

{lb, rb} = {1, 10};

bcl = z'[lb] == -2;
bcr := z'[rb] == 0;

sol1 = NDSolveValue[{eq, bcl, bcr}, z, {r, lb, rb}];

Plot[sol1[r], {r, lb, rb}, PlotRange -> All]

enter image description here


However, this approach isn't that stable. Though the value of rb is an approximation of infinity, it turns out that the solution will go wild if we set rb a little larger:


rb = 20;

sol2 = NDSolveValue[{eq, bcl, bcr}, z, {r, lb, rb}];
Plot[sol2[r], {r, lb, rb}, PlotRange -> All]

enter image description here


One can relieve the problem by manually setting a better initial guess and sub-method (by trial and error) to "Shooting" method:


sol3 = NDSolveValue[{eq, bcl, bcr}, z, {r, lb, rb}, 
Method -> {"Shooting", "StartingInitialConditions" -> {bcr, z[rb] == 0},
Method -> "StiffnessSwitching"}]
Plot[sol3[r], {r, lb, rb}, PlotRange -> All]


enter image description here


But is there a better approach?


The answer is yes.


The key point is to use the asymptotic solution at far field (not sure if I've used the correct terminology) as the b.c. instead of that at infinity. (I found this technique in Huh, Chun, and L. E. Scriven. "Shapes of axisymmetric fluid interfaces of unbounded extent." Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 30.3 (1969): 323-337. but it's probably not the only place the technique is mentioned.)


Since $z(r)\to 0$ when $r$ is large enough, we have


Series[1/Sqrt[1 + z'[r]^2]^3, {z'[r], 0, 5}]
Series[1/Sqrt[1 + z'[r]^2], {z'[r], 0, 5}]

$$\frac{1}{(\sqrt{z'(r)^2+1})^3}= 1-\frac{3}{2} z'(r)^2+\frac{15}{8} z'(r)^4+O(z'(r)^6)$$ $$\frac{1}{\sqrt{z'(r)^2+1}}=1-\frac{1}{2} z'(r)^2+\frac{3}{8} z'(r)^4+O(z'(r)^6)$$


Neglecting high order terms, we deduce the asymptotic equation in the outer zone:



eqOuter = z''[r] + z'[r]/r - z[r] == 0;

Solve eqOuter with b.c. at infinity:


generalOuter[c_, r_] = 
FullSimplify[
Limit[DSolve[{eqOuter, z'[rInf] == 0}, z, r][[1, 1, -1]][r], rInf -> ∞],
r > 0] /. C[1] -> -c Pi/2 I

particularOuter[r_, rMiddle_, tanMiddle_] =
generalOuter[c, r] /.

Solve[Derivative[0, 1][generalOuter][c, rMiddle] == tanMiddle, c][[1]]

Now we get the new right boundary:


newbcr := z[rb] == particularOuter[rb, rb, z'[rb]];

Notice though particularOuter is a asymptotic solution, as r increases, it becomes prominent very fast i.e. we can obtain a good enough solution without a very large rb:


rb = 2;
solnew = NDSolveValue[{eq, bcl, newbcr}, z, {r, lb, rb}]

Show[Plot[particularOuter[r, rb, solnew'[rb]], {r, rb, 10}, PlotRange -> All],

Plot[solnew[r], {r, lb, rb}], AxesOrigin -> {1, 0}]

enter image description here


Can you tell the value of rb only by checking the graph :D?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...