Skip to main content

numerical integration - Meniscus outside of a cylinder - axisymmetric Young-Laplace equation in semi-infinite domain


How to solve the axisymmetric Young-Laplace equation


$$\frac{z'(r)}{r \sqrt{z'(r)^2+1}}+\frac{z''(r)}{\left(z'(r)^2+1\right)^{3/2}}=z(r)$$


with b.c.s


$$z'(1)=-2$$$$z'(\infty)=0$$


where $z=Z/l_c$ and $r=R/l_c$ are dimensionless height and radius, $Z$, $R$ are the corresponding real height and radius, $l_c=\sqrt{\frac{\gamma }{g \rho }}$ is capillary length, $\gamma$ is surface tension, $g$ is the acceleration of gravity and $\rho$ is the density difference between phases. The solution of the problem describes the shape of meniscus outside of a cylinder, how can I obtain it with NDSolve?



Answer






Because of an arguable backslide around v11, the code pieces for sol1 and sol3 are broken since then. I haven't yet found a easy workaround.


Luckily, core parts of this answer i.e. those about solnew are not influenced.



The most direct solution for the problem seems to be approximating the b.c. at infinity with a b.c. that's just far enough e.g.


$$z'(10)\approx z'(\infty)=0$$


and it's indeed applicable:


eq = z''[r]/(1 + z'[r]^2)^(3/2) + z'[r]/(r (Sqrt[1 + z'[r]^2])) == z[r];

{lb, rb} = {1, 10};

bcl = z'[lb] == -2;
bcr := z'[rb] == 0;

sol1 = NDSolveValue[{eq, bcl, bcr}, z, {r, lb, rb}];

Plot[sol1[r], {r, lb, rb}, PlotRange -> All]

enter image description here


However, this approach isn't that stable. Though the value of rb is an approximation of infinity, it turns out that the solution will go wild if we set rb a little larger:


rb = 20;

sol2 = NDSolveValue[{eq, bcl, bcr}, z, {r, lb, rb}];
Plot[sol2[r], {r, lb, rb}, PlotRange -> All]

enter image description here


One can relieve the problem by manually setting a better initial guess and sub-method (by trial and error) to "Shooting" method:


sol3 = NDSolveValue[{eq, bcl, bcr}, z, {r, lb, rb}, 
Method -> {"Shooting", "StartingInitialConditions" -> {bcr, z[rb] == 0},
Method -> "StiffnessSwitching"}]
Plot[sol3[r], {r, lb, rb}, PlotRange -> All]


enter image description here


But is there a better approach?


The answer is yes.


The key point is to use the asymptotic solution at far field (not sure if I've used the correct terminology) as the b.c. instead of that at infinity. (I found this technique in Huh, Chun, and L. E. Scriven. "Shapes of axisymmetric fluid interfaces of unbounded extent." Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 30.3 (1969): 323-337. but it's probably not the only place the technique is mentioned.)


Since $z(r)\to 0$ when $r$ is large enough, we have


Series[1/Sqrt[1 + z'[r]^2]^3, {z'[r], 0, 5}]
Series[1/Sqrt[1 + z'[r]^2], {z'[r], 0, 5}]

$$\frac{1}{(\sqrt{z'(r)^2+1})^3}= 1-\frac{3}{2} z'(r)^2+\frac{15}{8} z'(r)^4+O(z'(r)^6)$$ $$\frac{1}{\sqrt{z'(r)^2+1}}=1-\frac{1}{2} z'(r)^2+\frac{3}{8} z'(r)^4+O(z'(r)^6)$$


Neglecting high order terms, we deduce the asymptotic equation in the outer zone:



eqOuter = z''[r] + z'[r]/r - z[r] == 0;

Solve eqOuter with b.c. at infinity:


generalOuter[c_, r_] = 
FullSimplify[
Limit[DSolve[{eqOuter, z'[rInf] == 0}, z, r][[1, 1, -1]][r], rInf -> ∞],
r > 0] /. C[1] -> -c Pi/2 I

particularOuter[r_, rMiddle_, tanMiddle_] =
generalOuter[c, r] /.

Solve[Derivative[0, 1][generalOuter][c, rMiddle] == tanMiddle, c][[1]]

Now we get the new right boundary:


newbcr := z[rb] == particularOuter[rb, rb, z'[rb]];

Notice though particularOuter is a asymptotic solution, as r increases, it becomes prominent very fast i.e. we can obtain a good enough solution without a very large rb:


rb = 2;
solnew = NDSolveValue[{eq, bcl, newbcr}, z, {r, lb, rb}]

Show[Plot[particularOuter[r, rb, solnew'[rb]], {r, rb, 10}, PlotRange -> All],

Plot[solnew[r], {r, lb, rb}], AxesOrigin -> {1, 0}]

enter image description here


Can you tell the value of rb only by checking the graph :D?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.