Skip to main content

replacement - Replacing composite variables by a single variable


To replace a single variable by another variable, one can simply use the the replace all (/.) operator (e.g., x/(y*z) /. x -> w returns $\displaystyle \frac{w}{yz}$).


How does one replace an expression consisting of multiple variables? Trying to replace the denominator in the previous expression by a single variable fails with the following syntax:


x/(y*z) /. y*z -> w
x/(y*z) /. y*z :> w
x/(y*z) /. (y*z) -> w
x/(y*z) /. (y*z) :> w
x/(y*z) /. Times[y, z] -> w

x/(y*z) /. Times[y, z] :> w

Edit: By applying FullForm, I see that the variable substitution can be made by the following lengthy expression:


x/(y*z) /. Times[Power[y, -1], Power[z, -1]] -> w^-1

However, this now fails in a case such as the following:


(x + Log[y*z])/(y*z) /. Times[Power[y, -1], Power[z, -1]] -> w^-1

Now one must use something like the following (which does not work).


(x + Log[y*z])/(y*z) /. {Times[Power[y, -1], Power[z, -1]] -> w^-1, Times[y, z] -> w}


Is there a more general way to replace variables with delving into the full form representation?




Answer



You can't use replacements that way, because Mathematica does not do replacements on expressions the way they appear to you. To see what I mean, take a look at the FullForm of your expression:


x/(y*z) // FullForm
Out[1]= Times[x,Power[y,-1],Power[z,-1]]

Whereas, the replacement that you're using is Times[y, z].


In general, it is not a good idea to use approaches that exploit the structure of expressions to do mathematical replacements. You might think you have nailed the replacement down, but it will break for a slightly different equation or terms.



To do this in a fail safe manner, you can use Simplify as:


Simplify[x/(y z), w == y z]
Out[2]= x/w

For more complicated examples, you might have to use Eliminate. From the documentation:


Eliminate[{f == x^5 + y^5, a == x + y, b == x y}, {x, y}]
Out[3] = f == a^5 - 5 a^3 b + 5 a b^2

Also read the tutorial on eliminating variables.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.