Skip to main content

expression manipulation - Assume symbolic elements as reals in TensorExpand


Let's assume that a, b are complex variables, and A[t],B[u], C[t,u] are matrices.


In[1]   TensorExpand[(a A[t].B[u] + b C[t, u]).C[t, u]]

Out[1] (b C[t, u]).C[t, u] + (a A[t].B[u]).C[t, u]

Now this is not quite what I want. Since a and b are complex, the parentheses are unnecessary. But wait, I can let Mathematica know, that they are not vectors or matrices:


In[1]  $Assumptions = Element[{a, b}, Complexes]
TensorExpand[(a A[t].B[u] + b C[t, u]).C[t, u]]
Out[1] b C[t, u].C[t, u] + a A[t].B[u].C[t, u]

But I want to take this one step further, let's write a function that takes care of the job:


In[1]  myExpand[expr_] := Module[{},
$Assumptions = Element[_Symbol, Complexes];

Return[TensorExpand[expr]];
]
Out[1] (b C[t, u]).C[t, u] + (a A[t].B[u]).C[t, u]

Well, that didn't work as I wanted. But I can still read all the symbolic variables:


In[1]  symbolicQ[x_] := MatchQ[Head[x], Symbol];
myExpand[expr_] := Module[{},
$Assumptions = Element[DeleteDuplicates[Select[Level[expr, Infinity], symbolicQ]], Complexes];
Return[TensorExpand[expr]];
]


However, this feels clumsy. Is there a better way? What is the better way? If in doubt, choose the more performant way.



Answer



This works:


myExpand[expr_] := Assuming[
Cases[expr, _Symbol, All] ∈ Reals,
TensorExpand@expr
]

myExpand[(a A[t].B[u] + b C[t, u]).C[t, u]]

(* b C[t, u].C[t, u] + a A[t].B[u].C[t, u] *)

A few notes:



  • Your Module is unnecessary - it doesn't do anything like this

  • Return is also unnecessary (even with Module). See here

  • If you want to temporarily set $Assumptions, use Assuming. In general (i.e. when there's no function that does it for you, use Block: Block[{$var=…},…]

  • Use Cases[expr,pat,level] instead of Select[Level[expr,level],check]

  • Use MatchQ[expr,_head] instead of MatchQ[Head[expr],head]. This also makes using Cases more natural in this case



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?