Skip to main content

list manipulation - Longest and Shortest won't work in ReplaceList?


I'm trying to make a pattern that's easy to preceive by human but hard to write out by Mathematica when I came across this problem. (Check the original problem here)


Let's check this simple case:


I've got a list {5,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,4,3,3,3,3,3,3,10} and I would like to find out all the recurrence period and the sequence before and after them. So, if you have a brief match with your brain, you can know there are two possible matchs:{5,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,4,3,3,3,3,3,3,10} and {5,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,4,3,3,3,3,3,3,10}.


It's okay if I only want to find out one of them, using the following code will work as desired:


Replace[{5, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 10}, 
{Shortest[pre___, 3], Longest[Repeated[Shortest[rep__, 1], {2, Infinity}]], Shortest[inc___, 2]}
:> {{pre}, {rep}, {inc}}]

(*{{5}, {1, 2}, {4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 10}}*)


But If I want to find out all of them, it's not quite direct as the following code which simply change Replace to ReplaceList will not work:


r1=
ReplaceList[{5, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 10},
{Shortest[pre___, 3], Longest[Repeated[Shortest[rep__, 1], {2, Infinity}]], Shortest[inc___, 2]}
:> {{pre}, {rep}, {inc}}]

The result is incredibly long and included all the possible match and ignored all the Shortest or Longest:


r2 = ReplaceList[{5, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 10},
{pre___, Repeated[rep__, {2, Infinity}], inc___} :> {{pre}, {rep}, {inc}}]


Sort@r1==Sort@r2

(*True*)

This is, of course, not the desired result, but how can I set the pattern-matcher to do this work? And are there any reason that ReplaceList will ignore all these Shortest and Longest? Any help or any other approach other than my way is appreciated. But of course, the final goal is to solve this using ReplaceList or similar functions.



Answer



To me this is an interesting problem, however I think the question is a misguided one.


Briefly: Longest and Shortest only change the order in which an expression is searched for a match. They are not filters that eliminate potential matches.


As noted in the documentation:




If no explicit Shortest or Longest is given, ordinary expression patterns are normally effectively assumed to be Shortest[p], while string patterns are assumed to be Longest[p].


If several Shortest objects occur in the same expression, those that appear first are given higher priority to match shortest sequences.


If several Longest objects occur in the same expression, those that appear first are given higher priority to match longest sequences.



Realize then that all patterns already have a length priority as established by their type and position.


For example this always gives the same output:


Replace[{1, 2, 3, Pi, 4.4, 1/5}, {a__Integer, b__?NumericQ} :> {{a}, {b}}]



{{1}, {2, 3, π, 4.4, 1/5}}

This pattern is the same as {Shortest[a__Integer], Shortest[b__?NumericQ]}. The priorities determine the order in which different alignments are tried and the first match is returned. This process is always the same therefore the result is always the same. Using a different length priority results in a different search order and (possibly) a different match but it is always deterministic.


So what happens when we use ReplaceList? The same priorities are respected but now the pattern engine keeps looking for matches rather than stopping with the first one found, and all matches are returned in the order searched. Compare these outputs:


expr = {1, 2, 3, Pi, 4.4, 1/5};

ReplaceList[expr, {a__Integer, b__?NumericQ} :> {{a}, {b}}]

ReplaceList[expr, {Longest[a__Integer], b__?NumericQ} :> {{a}, {b}}]



{{{1}, {2, 3, π, 4.4, 1/5}}, {{1, 2}, {3, π, 4.4, 1/5}}, {{1, 2, 3}, {π, 4.4, 1/5}}}

{{{1, 2, 3}, {π, 4.4, 1/5}}, {{1, 2}, {3, π, 4.4, 1/5}}, {{1}, {2, 3, π, 4.4, 1/5}}}

Note that Longest is not ignored; it changes the search order, as it always does.


While the order is different the set of matches is the same; it has to be because the same input expression and the same patterns are used in each case. All that changes is the order in which the alignments are checked.


To illustrate this in different way without ReplaceList we can use a failed condition to echo back matching alignments.


expr /. {a__Integer, b__?NumericQ} /; Print[{a}, " ", {b}] -> Null;



{1} {2,3,Ï€,4.4,1/5}


{1,2} {3,Ï€,4.4,1/5}


{1,2,3} {Ï€,4.4,1/5}



expr /. {Longest[a__Integer], b__?NumericQ} /; Print[{a}, " ", {b}] -> Null;


{1,2,3} {Ï€,4.4,1/5}


{1,2} {3,Ï€,4.4,1/5}



{1} {2,3,Ï€,4.4,1/5}



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...