Skip to main content

string manipulation - A simple StringCases problem


Given this text:


text1 = "  A  Vitamin D Deficiency (ICD-9-CM 268.9) (ICD-9-CM 268.9) 09/11/2015  01 ";


Yes, the ICD code values are duplicates- possibly but not certainly in all the records.


What string expression will match only the code values - twice if duplicated? I've tried:


StringCases[text1, "(ICD-9-CM " ~~ code__ ~~ ")" .. :> code, 
Overlaps -> False]

(* {"268.9) (ICD-9-CM 268.9"} *)

StringCases[text1, "(ICD-9-CM " ~~ code__ ~~ ")" .. :> code, Overlaps -> True]

(* {"268.9) (ICD-9-CM 268.9", "268.9"} *)


StringCases[text1, "(ICD-9-CM " ~~ code__ ~~ ")" .. :> code,
Overlaps -> All]

(* {"268.9) (ICD-9-CM 268.9", "268.9", "268.9"} *)

Removing the .. repeat pattern doesn't alter the outputs. What's the explanation for this behavior?



Answer



You could simply find the shortest match:


StringCases[text1, "(ICD-9-CM " ~~ Shortest[code__] ~~ ")" :> code]



{"268.9", "268.9"}

If it is possible that there is additional space or other characters a combination may be more robust:


text2 = "  A  Vitamin D Deficiency (ICD-9-CM   268.9) (ICD-9-CM: 268.9) 09/11/2015  01 ";

StringCases[text2, Shortest["(ICD-9-CM" ~~ __ ~~ code : NumberString ~~ ")"] :> code]



{"268.9", "268.9"}



Albert Retey suggested a method scanning for Except[")"] to restrict the pattern to a single field. I believe this is equivalent to my use of Shortest, but I was curious to find out how the two compared. We can view the Regular Expression that Mathematica internally converts each StringExpression to with StringPattern`PatternConvert. I will include two placements of Shortest.


StringPattern`PatternConvert /@ {
"(ICD-9-CM " ~~ Shortest[code__] ~~ ")",
Shortest["(ICD-9-CM " ~~ code__ ~~ ")"],
"(ICD-9-CM " ~~ code : (Except[")"] ..) ~~ ")"
} // Column



{"(?ms)\\(ICD-9-CM (.+?)\\)", {{Hold[code], 1}}, {}, Hold[None]}
{"(?ms)\\(ICD-9-CM (.+?)\\)", {{Hold[code], 1}}, {}, Hold[None]}
{"(?ms)\\(ICD-9-CM ((?:[^)])+)\\)", {{Hold[code], 1}}, {}, Hold[None]}

We see that both Shortest placements produce the same RE. We also see that the method using Except is more complex, and would appear to be performing additional testing that is ultimately unnecessary. I would expect it to be slower, and it is, but only slightly:


textBig = StringJoin @ ConstantArray[text1, 1*^6];

StringCases[textBig, Shortest["(ICD-9-CM " ~~ code__ ~~ ")"] :> code] // Timing // First


StringCases[textBig, "(ICD-9-CM " ~~ code : (Except[")"] ..) ~~ ")" :> code] //
Timing // First


0.718


0.812



Interestingly the hand-written RE is quite a bit slower:


StringCases[textBig, RegularExpression["\\(ICD-9-CM\\s*([^\\)]*)\\s*\\)"] :> "$1"] // 
Timing // First



1.872



I started a new question about this here: Why is StringExpression faster than RegularExpression?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...