Skip to main content

differential equations - Problems with stress distribution using FEM



enter image description here


I'm trying to get the displacements u(x,y) and v(x,y) of a beam simply suported, the stress distribution in the middle section should be a linear function: enter image description here


but i'm getting this:


enter image description here


My code is:


Needs["NDSolve`FEM`"];
PS = {
Inactive[
Div][{{0, -((Y \[Nu])/(1 - \[Nu]^2))}, {-((Y (1 - \[Nu]))/(
2 (1 - \[Nu]^2))), 0}}.Inactive[Grad][v[x, y], {x, y}], {x,

y}] + Inactive[
Div][{{-(Y/(1 - \[Nu]^2)),
0}, {0, -((Y (1 - \[Nu]))/(2 (1 - \[Nu]^2)))}}.Inactive[Grad][
u[x, y], {x, y}], {x, y}],
Inactive[
Div][{{0, -((Y (1 - \[Nu]))/(2 (1 - \[Nu]^2)))}, {-((Y \[Nu])/(
1 - \[Nu]^2)), 0}}.Inactive[Grad][u[x, y], {x, y}], {x, y}] +
Inactive[
Div][{{-((Y (1 - \[Nu]))/(2 (1 - \[Nu]^2))),
0}, {0, -(Y/(1 - \[Nu]^2))}}.Inactive[Grad][

v[x, y], {x, y}], {x, y}]
}

L = 2;
q = 6000;
Propiedades = {Y -> 205940000000, \[Nu] -> 30/100};

h1 = 1/2;
h2 = 2;
h3 = 3;


Reg1 = Rectangle[{0, 0}, {L, h1}];
Reg2 = Rectangle[{0, 0}, {L, h2}];
Reg3 = Rectangle[{0, 0}, {L, h3}];

Mesh1 = ToElementMesh[Reg1, MeshQualityGoal -> 0];
Mesh2 = ToElementMesh[Reg2];
Mesh3 = ToElementMesh[Reg3];
{u1, v1, \[Sigma]x1, \[Sigma]y1, \[Tau]xy1} = NDSolveValue[{
PS == {0, NeumannValue[-q, {0 <= x <= L, y == h1}]},

\[Sigma]x[x, y] ==
Y/(1 - \[Nu]^2) (D[u[x, y], x] + \[Nu] D[v[x, y], y]),
\[Sigma]y[x, y] ==
Y/(1 - \[Nu]^2) (D[v[x, y], y] + \[Nu] D[u[x, y], x]),
\[Sigma]xy[x, y] == (Y*\[Nu])/(
1 - \[Nu]^2) (D[u[x, y], x] + D[v[x, y], y]),
DirichletCondition[v[x, y] == 0, {x == 0, y == 0}],
DirichletCondition[v[x, y] == 0, {x == L, y == 0}],
DirichletCondition[u[x, y] == 0, {x == 0, y == 0}]
} /. Propiedades, {u,

v, \[Sigma]x, \[Sigma]y, \[Sigma]xy}, {x, y} \[Element] Mesh1];

DMesh1 = ElementMeshDeformation[Mesh1, {u1, v1},
"ScalingFactor" -> 2000000];

Row[{
Show[{Mesh1[
"Wireframe"[
"ElementMeshDirective" ->
Directive[EdgeForm[Gray], FaceForm[]]]],

Graphics[{EdgeForm[Thickness[0.001]], RGBColor[0, 0, 0, 0.1],
Reg1}]}, ImageSize -> 300, Epilog -> {
Scale[Translate[Apoyo2, {-0.5, -0.5}], 0.2],
Scale[Translate[Apoyo1, {-0.5 + L, -0.5}], 0.2]
}, PlotRange -> {{-0.1, L + 0.1}, {-0.15, h1 + 0.15}}],
Show[{
Mesh1[
"Wireframe"[
"ElementMeshDirective" ->
Directive[EdgeForm[Gray], FaceForm[]]]],

DMesh1[
"Wireframe"[
"ElementMeshDirective" ->
Directive[EdgeForm[RGBColor[0, 0.3, 0.8]], FaceForm[]]]]
}, ImageSize -> 300]
}]

Plot[\[Sigma]x1[L/2, y]/1000, {y, 0, h1}, Filling -> Axis,
AxesLabel -> {"h[m]",
"\!\(\*SubscriptBox[\(\[Sigma]\), \(x\)]\)[kPa]"},

ImageSize -> 400]

I don't why is this happening, but when i set the y coordinate in the Dirichlet Condition to y=h1/2 i get the correct stress distribution



Answer



Your boundary conditions seem to be not quite correct according to the mechanical problem. Sorry, I don't have the time to go through your code today, but I got a version running, although this will take some time and might be an overkill, since it is based on the full 3D theory. I have to go home now, I will try to take a look at your code again tomorrow, if nobody else finds the error.




EDIT: correction of your boundary conditions


Hey Gonza_! In your code, you wanted to treat the mechanical problem as follows.


enter image description here


You only had a slight syntax error in your boundary conditions



(*Wrong*)
bcwrong = {
DirichletCondition[v[x, y] == 0, {x == 0, y == 0}]
, DirichletCondition[u[x, y] == 0, {x == 0, y == 0}]
, DirichletCondition[v[x, y] == 0, {x == L, y == 0}]
};
(*Correct*)
bccorrect = {
DirichletCondition[{u[x, y] == 0, v[x, y] == 0}, x == 0 && y == 0]
, DirichletCondition[v[x, y] == 0, x == L && y == 0]

};

The difference is that the bcwrong impose a vanishing displacement field at every point with x==0 and at every point with y==0. The correct syntax is given in bccorrect. Working code:


Needs["NDSolve`FEM`"];
(*Geometry*)
L = 2;
h1 = 1/2;
Reg1 = Rectangle[{0, 0}, {L, h1}];
Mesh1 = ToElementMesh[Reg1, MeshQualityGoal -> 0];
(*Forces*)

q = 6000;
(*Material properties*)
Propiedades = {Y -> 205940000000, \[Nu] -> 30/100};
(*2D Hooke's law*)
hl = {
\[Sigma]x[x, y] ==
Y/(1 - \[Nu]^2) (D[u[x, y], x] + \[Nu] D[v[x, y], y])
, \[Sigma]y[x, y] ==
Y/(1 - \[Nu]^2) (D[v[x, y], y] + \[Nu] D[u[x, y], x])
, \[Sigma]xy[x,

y] == (Y*\[Nu])/(1 - \[Nu]^2) (D[u[x, y], x] + D[v[x, y], y])
};
(*Equations*)
PS = {Inactive[
Div][{{0, -((Y \[Nu])/(1 - \[Nu]^2))}, {-((Y (1 - \[Nu]))/(2 (1 \
- \[Nu]^2))), 0}}.Inactive[Grad][v[x, y], {x, y}], {x, y}] +
Inactive[
Div][{{-(Y/(1 - \[Nu]^2)),
0}, {0, -((Y (1 - \[Nu]))/(2 (1 - \[Nu]^2)))}}.Inactive[Grad][
u[x, y], {x, y}], {x, y}],

Inactive[
Div][{{0, -((Y (1 - \[Nu]))/(2 (1 - \[Nu]^2)))}, {-((Y \
\[Nu])/(1 - \[Nu]^2)), 0}}.Inactive[Grad][u[x, y], {x, y}], {x, y}] +
Inactive[
Div][{{-((Y (1 - \[Nu]))/(2 (1 - \[Nu]^2))),
0}, {0, -(Y/(1 - \[Nu]^2))}}.Inactive[Grad][
v[x, y], {x, y}], {x, y}]};
(*BCs*)
(*Neumann*)
bcN = {0, NeumannValue[-q, y == h1]};

(*Wrong*)
bcwrong = {
DirichletCondition[v[x, y] == 0, {x == 0, y == 0}]
, DirichletCondition[u[x, y] == 0, {x == 0, y == 0}]
, DirichletCondition[v[x, y] == 0, {x == L, y == 0}]
};
(*Correct*)
bccorrect = {
DirichletCondition[{u[x, y] == 0, v[x, y] == 0}, x == 0 && y == 0]
, DirichletCondition[v[x, y] == 0, x == L && y == 0]

};
(*FEM-solution*)
{u1, v1, \[Sigma]x1, \[Sigma]y1, \[Tau]xy1} =
NDSolveValue[{PS == bcN, hl, bccorrect} /. Propiedades, {u,
v, \[Sigma]x, \[Sigma]y, \[Sigma]xy}
, Element[{x, y}, Mesh1]];
(*Deformation*)
DMesh1 = ElementMeshDeformation[Mesh1, {u1, v1},
"ScalingFactor" -> 6*10^4];
Show[{Mesh1[

"Wireframe"[
"ElementMeshDirective" -> Directive[EdgeForm[Gray], FaceForm[]]]],
DMesh1[
"Wireframe"[
"ElementMeshDirective" ->
Directive[EdgeForm[RGBColor[0, 0.3, 0.8]], FaceForm[]]]]},
ImageSize -> 300]
(*Normal stress at x=L/2 depending on y*)
Plot[\[Sigma]x1[L/2, y]/1000, {y, 0, h1}, Filling -> Axis,
AxesLabel -> {"h[m]",

"\!\(\*SubscriptBox[\(\[Sigma]\), \(x\)]\)[kPa]"},
ImageSize -> 400]

enter image description here




General 3D theory


I treated the problem as follows (length in x direction L1, in virtual y direction L2 and in z direction L3)


enter image description here


First, let's get a reference solution of the 1D theory:


(*Geometry - in m*)

L1 = 2;
L2 = 0.1;
L3 = 0.2;
Iy = L2*L3^3/12;
(*Force and densities - in N*)
F = 10;
qA = F/(L1*L2); (*area density - for 3D FEM*)
ql = qA*L2; (*line density - for 1D theory*)
(*Material parameters*)
Em = 2.1*10^9; (*Young's modulus*)

nu = 0.3;(*Poisson's ration*)
(*1D theory*)
wsol1D = DSolveValue[{
Em*Iy*D[w[x], {x, 4}] == ql
, (w[0]) == 0, (w[L1]) == 0
, (w''[0]) == 0, (w''[L1]) == 0
}, w, x];
My = -Em*Iy*wsol1D''[x];(*Moment*)
sig = My/Iy*z;(*normal stress*)
GraphicsRow[{

Plot[wsol1D[x], {x, 0, L1}, AxesLabel -> {"x", "w(x)"}]
, Plot[sig /. x -> L1/2, {z, -L3/2, L3/2},
AxesLabel -> {"z", "\[Sigma](x=L1/2,z)"}]
}
, ImageSize -> Large
]

enter image description here


Now, let's get the full 3D FEM solution (takes 1.4 seconds for me) with a area force density


(*FEM solution*)

Needs["NDSolve`FEM`"]
(******************************)
(*Region definition*)
reg = Cuboid[{0, -L2/2, -L3/2}, {L1, L2/2, L3/2}];
(******************************)
(*Isotropic material stiffness - fourth-order tensor*)
(*Identities*)
I2 = IdentityMatrix@3;
IdI = TensorProduct[I2, I2];
I4 = TensorTranspose[IdI, {1, 3, 2, 4}];

IS = (I4 + TensorTranspose[I4, {1, 2, 4, 3}])/2;
(*Isotropic projectors*)
P1 = 1/3*IdI;
P2 = IS - P1;
(*Isotropic stiffness*)
Ciso = l1*P1 + l2*P2;
l1 = 3*Km;
l2 = 2*Gm;
Km = 1/3*Em/(1 - 2*nu);
Gm = 1/2*Em/(1 + nu);

(******************************)
(*Equations*)
eq = Table[
Inactive[Div][
Ciso[[i, ;; , 1, ;;]].Inactive[Grad][u[x, y, z], {x, y, z}], {x,
y, z}]
+ Inactive[Div][
Ciso[[i, ;; , 2, ;;]].Inactive[Grad][v[x, y, z], {x, y, z}], {x,
y, z}]
+ Inactive[Div][

Ciso[[i, ;; , 3, ;;]].Inactive[Grad][w[x, y, z], {x, y, z}], {x,
y, z}]
, {i, 3}
];
(******************************)
(*BCs*)
(*Dirichlet*)
bcD = {
DirichletCondition[{u[x, y, z] == 0, v[x, y, z] == 0,
w[x, y, z] == 0}, x == 0 && z == 0]

, DirichletCondition[{v[x, y, z] == 0, w[x, y, z] == 0},
x == L1 && z == 0]
};
(*Neumann*)
bcN = {0, 0, NeumannValue[-qA, z == -L3/2]};
(******************************)
(*Solution*)
{usol, vsol, wsol} =
NDSolveValue[{eq == bcN, bcD}, {u, v, w}, Element[{x, y, z}, reg],
Method -> {"PDEDiscretization" -> {"FiniteElement",

"MeshOptions" -> {"MaxCellMeasure" -> 0.0001,
"MeshOrder" -> 2}}}
]; // AbsoluteTiming


{1.4435, Null}



You can take a look at the deformed mesh if you want


mesh = usol["ElementMesh"];
Show[{

mesh["Wireframe"]
, ElementMeshDeformation[mesh, {usol, vsol, wsol},
"ScalingFactor" -> 10^4][
"Wireframe"[
"ElementMeshDirective" -> Directive[EdgeForm[Red], FaceForm[]]]]
}, Axes -> True, AxesLabel -> {x, y, z}]

enter image description here


The FEM solution (FEM solution as red points) is in good accordance with the analytical 1D theory


Plot[wsol1D[x], {x, 0, L1}, 

Epilog -> {PointSize -> Medium, Red,
Point[Table[{x, wsol[x, 0, 0]}, {x, 0, L1, L1/10}]]}]

enter image description here


You can get the stress distribution at any point with the full 3D Hooke's law $\sigma_{ij} = C_{ijkl} u_{k,l}$ (FEM solution as red points) (remark: you dont need to symmetrize the displacement grandient in my code in order to obtain the infinitesimal strain, since the stiffness $C_{ijkl}$ I used symmetrizes automatically the mapped tensor). Let's get $\sigma_{xx} = \sigma_{11}$


uv[x_, y_, z_] := {usol[x, y, z], vsol[x, y, z], wsol[x, y, z]}
eps[xs_, ys_, zs_] :=
D[uv[x, y, z], {{x, y, z}, 1}] /. {x -> xs, y -> ys, z -> zs}
(*linear map of second order tensor B over fourth-order tensor A*)
lm[A_, B_] := TensorContract[TensorProduct[A, B], {{3, 5}, {4, 6}}]

(*Get Cauchy stress sigma_xx = sigma[[1,1]], at x=L1/2 depending on z with 3D Hooke's law*)
sigloc = lm[Ciso, eps[L1/2, 0, z]][[1, 1]];
siglocdata = Table[{zi, sigloc /. z -> zi}, {zi, -L3/2, L3/2, L3/10}];
Plot[sig /. x -> L1/2, {z, -L3/2, L3/2},
AxesLabel -> {"z", "\[Sigma](x=L1/2,z)"},
Epilog -> {PointSize -> Medium, Red, Point@siglocdata}]

enter image description here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...