Skip to main content

string manipulation - Possible bug in Export with CharacterEncoding -> "PrintableASCII"


In the Documentation we read (emphasis is mine):




By default, the Wolfram System uses the character encoding "PrintableASCII" when saving notebooks and packages. This means that when special characters are written out to files or external programs, they are represented purely as sequences of ordinary characters. This uniform representation is crucial in allowing special characters in the Wolfram Language to be used in a way that does not depend on the details of particular computer systems.


When creating packages and notebooks, special characters are always written out using full names.


ExportString["Lamé \[LongRightArrow] αβ+", "Package"]


"(* Created by Wolfram Mathematica 10.0 : www.wolfram.com *)
\"Lam\\[EAcute] \\[LongRightArrow] \\[Alpha]\\[Beta]+\"
"


In InputForm, all special characters are written out fully when using "PrintableASCII".


ToString["Lamé \[LongRightArrow] αβ+", InputForm, 
CharacterEncoding -> "PrintableASCII"]


"\"Lam\\[EAcute] \\[LongRightArrow] \\[Alpha]\\[Beta]+\""


In the above-cited examples the character é is converted into the corresponding Mathematica's platform-independent representation \[EAcute]. This is expected since this character isn't PrintableASCIIQ:


PrintableASCIIQ@"é"

ToCharacterCode@"é"
ToCharacterCode["é", "ASCII"]


False

{233}

None


Hence I expect that Exporting this character with CharacterEncoding -> "PrintableASCII" will also give me \[EAcute]:


Export["test1.txt", "é", "Text", 
CharacterEncoding -> "PrintableASCII"] // SystemOpen

Export["test2.txt", "é", "String",
CharacterEncoding -> "PrintableASCII"] // SystemOpen

The first input produces a file containing e', the second – a file with é.


Is this behavior correct? How can I export strings using only "PrintableASCII" and writing all the special characters in their FullForm as it happens when I Export as "Package"?





Further considerations


Wrapping the string by InputForm doesn't work:


Export["test3.txt", InputForm@"é", "String", 
CharacterEncoding -> "PrintableASCII"] // SystemOpen

produces a file containing "é" literally. It is worth to note that for ExportString wrapping by InputForm works:


ExportString[InputForm@"é", "String", CharacterEncoding -> "PrintableASCII"]


"\"\\[EAcute]\""


Wrapping by FullForm works but is unacceptable due to the quotation marks added:


Export["test4.txt", FullForm@"é", "String", 
CharacterEncoding -> "PrintableASCII"] // SystemOpen

produces a file containing "\[EAcute]" literally.


Exporting as "Package" doesn't serve as a workaround because of the header added and also because strings are exported with the quotation marks.


The same happens with CharacterEncoding -> None.



Answer



I'm afraid support didn't answer your question correctly. However, "String" is one of the most confusing formats we have, so I am not totally suprised.



If you look at the "Background and Context" on ref/format/String, you'll see



  • Arbitrary binary data represented as a Wolfram Language string.

  • Used for importing or exporting entire raw binary data.


Note in particular that it is used for binary data--binary data in general does not use character encodings. The intended use case is something along the lines of Import["foo.png", "String"], when you wish to operate directly on the bytes of the PNG rather than the image it contains. In the import case, each byte gets mapped to the corresponding code point in the range 0-255. In the export case, we have to do something if a special character > 255 appears, so it is converted to its long name. You can think of this as akin to ToString[expr, CharacterEncoding->"ISO8859-1"]. In short, "String" is very different from "Text", which attempts to interpret textual data.


In a world where we have ByteArray, we problably wouldn't have had the "String" format, as the ByteArray would be the natural data structure. We don't yet have this format, but it is certainly on our roadmap. For now, you can Export lists a ByteArray using the "Byte" format, and import "Byte" format and then pass it to ByteArray to convert it from a lists of bytes to a proper ByteArray object.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...