Skip to main content

pattern matching - Assign value to an odd function



I defined an odd function by


f[0]:=0;
f[x_?Negative]:=-f[-x]


Now I want to define the function for certain known values


Case a) If the known value is positive, it has no problem, i.e.:


f[1]:=7

it perfectly works because when I require f[-1] Mathematica tell me the correct answer -7;


Case b) If the known value is negative


f[-3]:=5

Mathematica store it but when I ask it f[3] it doesn't write -5.


I know this is because of my very definition, but it's an elegant way (possibly without helper functions and without storing manually both values at x and -x) to get the correct result?




Answer



Because Mathematica prioritizes specific function definitions over general ones, simply making the definition


M[i_, j_] := -M[j, i]

will work as long as you only try to evaluate M with values for i and j for which either M[i, j] or M[j, i] have been explicitly defined. Otherwise you get infinite recursion:


M[1, 2] := a
M[4, 3] := b

M[1, 2]
(* a *)


M[2, 1]
(* -a *)

M[3, 4]
(* -b *)

M[1, 3]
(* $RecursionLimit::reclim2: Recursion depth of 1024 exceeded during evaluation of M[3,1]. *)
(* Hold[-M[3, 1]] *)


Clear[M]

To avoid this, we can make a definition for M that only allows itself to be recursed twice, like so:


Module[{n = 0},
M[i_, j_] /; n < 2 := Block[{n = n + 1}, -M[j, i]]
]

The variable n counts the number of times that this definition of M has been called recursively. If n is less than two, the definition applies, and the i and j are swapped. When n is equal to two, the definition doesn't apply, and evaluation terminates. Since at this point the definition has been applied twice, the original expression is returned.


Now we have



M[1, 2] := a
M[4, 3] := b

M[1, 2]
(* a *)

M[2, 1]
(* -a *)

M[3, 4]

(* -b *)

M[1, 3]
(* M[1, 3] *)

(Side note: Mathematica colors the n in the Block expression red, because it thinks that we've created a naming conflict between the Module and the Block, but in fact it works just how we want.)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...