Skip to main content

calculus and analysis - Differentiating functions of vectors/matrices?


I'm dealing with derivatives of scalar functions of matrices and wondering if Mathematica can help me here.


The standard approach of expanding it in terms of components is cumbersome. As an motivating example, I want to minimize the following function, where $X$ is a matrix


$$f(X) = \text{tr}(X'X)$$


I can use matrix differential calculus to derive that one step of gradient descent to minimize this function is:


$$X^* = X - 2 X$$


On other hand, suppose $X$ is square, and my function is $$g(X)=\text{tr}(X^2)$$


Now, a single step of gradient descent looks as follows $$X^* = X - 2 X'$$



This can get complicated to do by hand, as an example, Exercise 1 of Magnus 9.10 asks to show that gradient descent step of the following function


$$h(X) = \det A X B$$


is the following


$$X^* = X-\det(AXB)(A'(B'X'A')^{-1}B')'$$


now take $$h^*(X) = \text{tr}(AX'BXC)$$ formula to do a single step of gradient descent is $$ \text{probably something simple} $$


Is there a way to get help deriving/checking expressions above in Mathematica?


(note, I'm using "gradient descent step" instead of "derivative" because there are multiple notations for derivative which differ in shape, but reformulating it as gradient descent removes ambiguity)



Answer



It is certainly fairly easy to check these relations for specific sizes of array:


X = Array[x, {7, 11}];

Map[D[Tr[Transpose[X].X], #] &, X, {2}] == 2 X
(* True *)

Y = Array[y, {17, 17}];
Map[D[Tr[Y.Y], #] &, Y, {2}] == 2 Transpose[Y]
(* True *)

Generalisation to the determinant expression should be relatively simple...


EDIT


Without being too rigorous about it, we can use the following relations to find some matrix derivatives (I assume in the following that all arguments to Tr are square )



With[{m = 4, n = 2, p = 3},
A = Array[a, {m, n}];
X = Array[x, {p, n}];
B = Array[b, {p, p}];
F = Array[c, {n, m}];
Y = Array[y, {n, p}];]


Tr[B] == Tr[Transpose[B]]
(* True *)


Tr[X.Y] == Tr[Y.X]
(* True *)

This allows us to derive (for example)


Tr[A.Transpose[X].B.X.F] == Tr[B.X.F.A.Transpose[X]] == Tr[Transpose[B].X.Transpose[A].Transpose[F].Transpose[X]] // Simplify
(* True *)

and guess the form of the derivative


Map[D[Tr[A.Transpose[X].B.X.F], #] &, X, {2}] == 

B.X.F.A + Transpose[B].X.Transpose[A].Transpose[F] // Expand
(* True *)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...