Skip to main content

calculus and analysis - Differentiating functions of vectors/matrices?


I'm dealing with derivatives of scalar functions of matrices and wondering if Mathematica can help me here.


The standard approach of expanding it in terms of components is cumbersome. As an motivating example, I want to minimize the following function, where $X$ is a matrix


$$f(X) = \text{tr}(X'X)$$


I can use matrix differential calculus to derive that one step of gradient descent to minimize this function is:


$$X^* = X - 2 X$$


On other hand, suppose $X$ is square, and my function is $$g(X)=\text{tr}(X^2)$$


Now, a single step of gradient descent looks as follows $$X^* = X - 2 X'$$



This can get complicated to do by hand, as an example, Exercise 1 of Magnus 9.10 asks to show that gradient descent step of the following function


$$h(X) = \det A X B$$


is the following


$$X^* = X-\det(AXB)(A'(B'X'A')^{-1}B')'$$


now take $$h^*(X) = \text{tr}(AX'BXC)$$ formula to do a single step of gradient descent is $$ \text{probably something simple} $$


Is there a way to get help deriving/checking expressions above in Mathematica?


(note, I'm using "gradient descent step" instead of "derivative" because there are multiple notations for derivative which differ in shape, but reformulating it as gradient descent removes ambiguity)



Answer



It is certainly fairly easy to check these relations for specific sizes of array:


X = Array[x, {7, 11}];

Map[D[Tr[Transpose[X].X], #] &, X, {2}] == 2 X
(* True *)

Y = Array[y, {17, 17}];
Map[D[Tr[Y.Y], #] &, Y, {2}] == 2 Transpose[Y]
(* True *)

Generalisation to the determinant expression should be relatively simple...


EDIT


Without being too rigorous about it, we can use the following relations to find some matrix derivatives (I assume in the following that all arguments to Tr are square )



With[{m = 4, n = 2, p = 3},
A = Array[a, {m, n}];
X = Array[x, {p, n}];
B = Array[b, {p, p}];
F = Array[c, {n, m}];
Y = Array[y, {n, p}];]


Tr[B] == Tr[Transpose[B]]
(* True *)


Tr[X.Y] == Tr[Y.X]
(* True *)

This allows us to derive (for example)


Tr[A.Transpose[X].B.X.F] == Tr[B.X.F.A.Transpose[X]] == Tr[Transpose[B].X.Transpose[A].Transpose[F].Transpose[X]] // Simplify
(* True *)

and guess the form of the derivative


Map[D[Tr[A.Transpose[X].B.X.F], #] &, X, {2}] == 

B.X.F.A + Transpose[B].X.Transpose[A].Transpose[F] // Expand
(* True *)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...