Skip to main content

graphics - Color ramp banding in PDFKit when exporting Raster image Inset to PDF



Here I produce a Raster image with large uniformly colored rectangles and put it in an Inset:


With[{n = 5},
Graphics[Inset[
Graphics[Raster[
{Map[
List @@ ColorConvert[ColorData["LakeColors"][#],
RGBColor] &, (Range[n - 1] - 1)/(n - 2)]}
]],
Automatic, Automatic, {.45, .5}
]

]
]

Raster


Now export this to PDF:


Export["p.pdf", %]

ramp artefacts


The uniform regions have been replaced by a series of discrete bands that seem to try an interpolate between the rectangles. This happens if I choose fewer rectangles too (e.g., n = 3).


If I generate the same thing without using Raster, the exported PDF looks fine - e.g., try this:



With[{n = 5},
Graphics[Inset[
Graphics[
MapIndexed[{ColorData["LakeColors"][#],
Translate[Rectangle[], {#2[[1]], 0}]} &, (Range[n - 1] -
1)/(n - 2)]
]
,
Automatic, Automatic, {.45, .5}
]

]
]

So it's the conversion of the rasterized image in Export that's responsible for this effect. Interestingly, one can work around this (on Mac) by selecting the graphic, going to Edit > Copy As > PDF and pasting the result into Preview.


Although I have some workarounds now, it still seems mysterious to me why this banding effect happens with Raster. And it would of course be nice if someone knew how to use Raster in an Inset inside a Graphics without triggering the effect that causes the blocks of the raster to lose their uniform color.


Also - the arguments to Inset can be left out (in particular the scaling {.45, .5}). But it seemed to me that this problem didn't always happen with Raster, and that it probably has something to do with the size of the bitmap being scaled up relative to some assumed coordinate system used in Export.



Answer



This issue seems to affect all PDFKit based viewers on OS X, but it doesn't appear to point to anything intrinsically wrong with Mathematica's PDF export. A work-around that allows you to view the exported PDF without color bands in PDFKit viewers such as Preview would be to use the following command when creating the PDF in Mathematica:


Export["py.pdf", 
p /. Graphics[Raster[i__]] :>

Image@Graphics[Raster[i]]]

Alternatively, if you know exactly where the Raster is being created, you may as well do the conversion immediately at that point. Then my example code above would have to be modified as follows:


With[{n = 5},
Graphics[Inset[
Image@Graphics[Raster[
{Map[
List @@ ColorConvert[ColorData["LakeColors"][#],
RGBColor] &, (Range[n - 1] - 1)/(n - 2)]}
]]]

]
]

After doing this, I see no more trace of the discrete bands.


Edit Originally I had inserted ColorConvert but then realized it's simply the conversion to Image that is required to make it work.


Edit 2


To make this more generally applicable: whenever your exported PDF shows banding in gradients, you could try to export the plot (let's call it plot) using this command:


Export["plot.pdf", plot /. Raster[i__] :>
Raster@ImageData@Image@Graphics[Raster[i]]]


Edit 3


This is an old post, but in the meantime I encountered similar issues in many other contexts and came up with a different work-around which also applies here:


rasterTrick[plot_] := 
Show[plot,
Prolog -> {Opacity[0], Texture[{{{0, 0, 0, 0}}}],
VertexTextureCoordinates -> {{0, 0}, {1, 0}, {1, 1}},
Polygon[{{0, 0}, {.1, 0}, {.1, .1}}]}]

Export["p.pdf", plot // rasterTrick]


The function rasterTrick was recently useful in answering this question (where you can also find a link to further explanations of how it works): Export MatrixPlot graphics to PDF


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...