Skip to main content

pure function - How to exchange two arguments?


Recently, I have being using Mathematica to write my undergraduate paper. I want to use two pattern lists such as { A -> a, B -> b, c -> C, ....} and { a -> A, b -> B, c -> C, ....} to make my code short. I can exchange { A -> a, B -> b, c -> C, ....}'s elements to achieve { a -> A, b -> B, c -> C, ....}, my trail is as below:


firstPattern = { A -> a, B -> b, c -> C, one -> two, tom -> david};


To achieve { a -> A, b -> B, C -> c, two -> one, david -> tom}, I write the code:


{#1, #2} -> {#2, #1}& /@ firstPattern

However, it failed. I wonder why and how to correct it.



Answer



Because life is more fun with infix:


firstPattern ~Reverse~ 2


{a -> A, b -> B, C -> c, two -> one, david -> tom}


(The serious point of this answer is that you can use the second parameter of Reverse to determine exactly what levels of the expression you wish to reverse.)


Also quite direct and terse:


#2 -> # & @@@ firstPattern


{a -> A, b -> B, C -> c, two -> one, david -> tom}

This works where your attempt doesn't by using Apply at level one, which has the shorthand @@@. This lets you access the parts of the rules rather than the entire rules themselves.





Timings


Timings, conducted in version 7, for various methods posted so far.


timeAvg = 
Function[func,
Do[If[# > 0.3, Return[#/5^i]] & @@ Timing@Do[func, {5^i}], {i, 0, 15}],
HoldFirst];

rules = Rule @@@ RandomInteger[999, {500000, 2}];

Reverse /@ rules // timeAvg

Reverse[rules, 2] // timeAvg
#2 -> # & @@@ rules // timeAvg
rules[[All, {2, 1}]] // timeAvg


0.1934

0.1342

0.259


0.1902



In an attempt to make this answer more worthy of the Accept I'd like to arbitrarily address an edge case that might come up. Suppose you have RuleDelayed expressions and you wish to reverse them:


rules = {a :> 1 + 1, b :> 2 + 2, c :> 3 + 3};
rules ~Reverse~ 2


{2 :> a, 4 :> b, 6 :> c}


Note that e.g. 1 + 1 became 2; for the sake of the illustration let's consider this unacceptable. Then we would need to wrap the left-hand-side in HoldPattern. A direct attempt using @@@ fails because the anonymous Function does not hold its arguments (by default):


HoldPattern[#2] -> # & @@@ rules


{HoldPattern[2] -> a, HoldPattern[4] -> b, HoldPattern[6] -> c}

One could add a HoldAll Attribute to the function but usually replacement patterns are simpler:


Replace[rules, (L_ :> R_) :> (HoldPattern[R] :> L), 1]



{HoldPattern[1 + 1] :> a, HoldPattern[2 + 2] :> b, HoldPattern[3 + 3] :> c}

Such rules may seem pointless but they can be useful for manipulating held expressions.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...