Skip to main content

filtering - Restoring the 1-to-1 correspondence between elements in two lists, where one list is used as a guide to prune elements from the other


when we wish to use one list to select items from another using something like Pick, writing the following code, for example, causes us to lose the 1-to-1 correspondence between items in the two lists:


dataArray = {"A","B","C","D","E","F","G"};
testArray = {0.223,0.3,1.2,0.44,4,0.24449,1.01};

dataArray = Pick[dataArray, #>= 1 &/@ testArray];

output = {"C", "E", "G"}

Without having to make a copy of anything, how do we safely prune items from, here testArray, to restore the previous 1-to-1 correspondence between elements in testArray and elements in dataArray? For example, if B in dataArray corresponds to 0.3 in testArray (based on its index), it should again do so after the Pick pruning step.



Answer



There are surely many ways to approach this problem. Which is best likely (again) depends on your data. I will illustrate three variants.


Paired data (a la decorate-and-sort)


We can do as Kuba did and merge the two lists into one to keep the elements together:


Select[{dataArray, testArray}\[Transpose], #[[2]] >= 1 &]



{{"C", 1.2}, {"E", 4}, {"G", 1.01}}

You can finish with a second Transpose to separate the data into two lists.


Reused mask


A typically faster method is to simply construct the mask once and then reuse it in Pick as needed:


mask = UnitStep[testArray - 1];

Pick[#, mask, 1] & /@ {dataArray, testArray}



{{"C", "E", "G"}, {1.2, 4, 1.01}}

Note that I converted your test to a vectorized numeric form for better performance.


Index-based filtering


Perhaps the top performing method for filter reapplication (especially in version 7 before Pick was better optimized) is to create a list of positions you wish to keep, then extract them using Part or Extract. Faster than Position, when applicable, is SparseArray, using the undocumented Properties method:


fastpos = SparseArray[#]["AdjacencyLists"] &;

idx = fastpos @ UnitStep[testArray - 1]



{3, 5, 7}

#[[idx]] & /@ {dataArray, testArray}


{{"C", "E", "G"}, {1.2, 4, 1.01}}

You can also process multiple lists at once with the help of All, like this:



{dataArray, testArray}[[All, idx]]


{{"C", "E", "G"}, {1.2, 4, 1.01}}

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...