Skip to main content

plotting - How can I prevent ColorFunction from disabling antialiasing in graphics?


When I use ColorFunction, the appearance of my plots is ruined, changing from this


Nice antialiased plot


which has the normal smooth lines and antialiased fonts, to this


Ugly plot


in which the line for the plot has become jagged and thin, and the fonts have lost their clear appearance, and the points have become jagged and have even shifted position a bit. The latter figure is useless to me.


How do I prevent this behavior? Is there a setting somewhere that I missed?


Setting the "Antialiasing Quality" to "Highest Quality" in Preferences, partly remedies the problem with the line, but points, fonts, and axes still shift, as if the scale of the figure has been changed:


enter image description here





Manipulate[Show[
{If[showcf,
ParametricPlot[{u, Sin[u]}, {u, 0, 2 Pi},
ColorFunction -> (White &), PlotStyle -> {Thickness[.02]}], {}],
ParametricPlot[{u, Sin[u]}, {u, 0, 2 Pi}],
Graphics[{Black, PointSize[Large], Point[{Pi, 0.5}], White,
PointSize[Medium], Point[{Pi, 0.5}]}]}],
{{showcf, False, "Show ColorFunction"}, {True, False}}]

Answer




Edit for version 10



This bug seems to have been fixed in Mathematica version 10 on OS X. The solution below is neither needed nor functional in version 10. It was intended for version 8.



The problem is caused by the appearance of VertexColors in the plot. Increasing the antialiasing quality doesn't really fix this, as you can see by exporting one of those plots to PDF. The color gradients are all wrong.


In principle, one can work around this by getting rid of the VertexColors and replacing them by rasterized images. Here is an attempt to do this for 2d line plots. It works in the context of this question, but should also work for other plots (maybe with additional adjustments):


Options[removeVertexCol] = {ImageResolution -> 300};

removeVertexCol[pp_, opts : OptionsPattern[]] :=
Module[

{pa, img, rangeCoords, plotRangeRule, x, noVertexPl},
pa = Show[
pp,
Axes -> None, Frame -> None, PlotRangePadding -> 0,
ImagePadding -> None
];
img = Rasterize[
pa,
"Image", ImageResolution -> OptionValue[ImageResolution]
];

plotRangeRule = AbsoluteOptions[pp, PlotRange];
rangeCoords = Transpose[PlotRange /. plotRangeRule];
noVertexPl =
Normal[(pp /. HoldPattern[VertexColors -> x__] :> Sequence[])];
Show[
Graphics[
First[
noVertexPl
] /. _?(MemberQ[{RGBColor, Hue, CMYKColor, GrayLevel},
Head[#]] &) -> RGBColor[1, 1, 1, 0],

Rest[List @@ noVertexPl]
],
Prolog -> Inset[
Show[img, AspectRatio -> Full], rangeCoords[[1]], {0, 0},
Subtract @@ rangeCoords
]
]
]

The function takes an option ImageResolution.



The idea is to make a rasterized version of the plot pp without axes and frames, and then underlay it with the original plot after removing all VertexColors from the latter. To make sure the two graphics are aligned, I remove any PlotRangePadding before rasterizing the plot. This means that you should avoid using PlotRangePadding in the original plot, and instead create any desired spacing by using an explicit PlotRange.


Below is how I would apply the above function to your example:


Manipulate[
Show[{
If[showcf,
removeVertexCol@
ParametricPlot[{u, Sin[u]}, {u, 0, 2 Pi}, ColorFunction -> Hue,
PlotStyle -> {Thickness[.02]},
PlotRange -> {Automatic, {-1.1, 1.1}}], {}
],

ParametricPlot[{u, Sin[u]}, {u, 0, 2 Pi},
PlotRange -> {Automatic, {-1.1, 1.1}}],
Graphics[{Black, PointSize[Large], Point[{Pi, 0.5}], White,
PointSize[Medium], Point[{Pi, 0.5}]}
]}
], {{showcf, False, "Show ColorFunction"}, {True, False}}]

The antialiasing is now preserved.


Edit


You may also look into replacing Show by Overlay in your example. But I don't have time to work out the details of the alignment - may get back later.



Edit 2


I made just a few modifications to your original code to get it to work with Overlay:


Manipulate[Overlay[
{If[showcf, removeVertexCol@ParametricPlot[{u, Sin[u]}, {u, 0, 2 Pi},
ColorFunction -> Hue, PlotStyle -> {Thickness[.02]},
PlotRange -> {Automatic, {-1.1, 1.1}},
AxesStyle -> Opacity[0]],
""
], ParametricPlot[{u, Sin[u]}, {u, 0, 2 Pi},
PlotRange -> {Automatic, {-1.1, 1.1}},

Epilog -> {
Black, PointSize[Large], Point[{Pi, 0.5}], White,
PointSize[Medium], Point[{Pi, 0.5}]
}
]
}
], {{showcf, False, "Show ColorFunction"}, {True, False}}]

Manipulate with Overlay


The circle/dot is now an Epilog in the second plot so that it is placed relative to the coordinates of that plot.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...