Skip to main content

plotting - ScalingFunctions - reversing a logarithmic axes


I have been playing with ScalingFunctions in Mathematica 11.0. I wanted to produce a logarithmic scaled plot with the direction reversed. I have had success with accomplishing my goals, but I have no understanding of why it works.


I am able to reverse the axis and/or create a logarithmic axes with out a problem.


Plot[x, {x, 1, 3}, 
PlotRange -> {{1, 3}, {1, 3}},
ScalingFunctions -> "Reverse"
]

Mathematica graphics


Plot[x, {x, 1, 3}, 

PlotRange -> {{1, 3}, {1, 3}},
ScalingFunctions -> "Log"
]

Mathematica graphics


In the documentation it talks about using


Mathematica graphics


as a scaling function and gives an example of


{-Log[#] &, Exp[-#] &}


I decided to try it.


Plot[x, {x, 1, 3}, 
PlotRange -> {{1, 3}, {1, 3}},
ScalingFunctions -> {None, {-Log[#] &, Exp[-#] &}}
]

Mathematica graphics


It produced what I wanted and in one sense that makes this a success. However, I am completely confused by what is going on.


The question is why does supplying ScalingFunctions with the negative of a the log and its inverse produce a logarithmic scaled plot with the direction reversed?



Answer




I've been curious about what the two different functions do in ScalingFunctions. I think we can get a clue by these two plots


Plot[x, {x, 1, 3}, PlotRange -> {{1, 3}, {1, 3}}, 
ScalingFunctions -> {None, #}] & /@ {{# &,
Exp[-#] &}, {-Log[#] &, # &}}

Mathematica graphics


So the first function is applied to the points, and the second function somehow used to construct the tick marks.


Let's look at your example,


{regularPlot = Plot[x, {x, 1, 3}, PlotRange -> {{1, 3}, {1, 3}}],
reverseLogPlot =

Plot[x, {x, 1, 3}, PlotRange -> {{1, 3}, {1, 3}},
ScalingFunctions -> {None, {-Log[#] &, Exp[-#] &}}]}

We can extract the plotted points from the first, apply -Log[#]& to them, and compare that to the points from the scaled plot,


list = Cases[regularPlot, Line[x__] :> x, Infinity] // 
First; reverseLogList =
reverseLogPlot // Cases[#, Line[x__] :> x, Infinity] & // First;
ListPlot /@ {reverseLogList, {#1, -Log[#2]} & @@@ list}

Mathematica graphics



and this confirms our suspicions about the first function.


I'm not sure exactly how the second function is applied to the tick marks though. This isn't quite right:


ListLinePlot[{#1, -Log[#2]} & @@@ list,
Ticks -> {Automatic, {#, NumberForm[Exp[-#], 2]} & /@
Range[-1, 0, .1]}]

Mathematica graphics


Edit


Actually, I have no idea how these functions seem to work, why do these simple examples do nothing?


Plot[x, {x, -1, 3}, PlotRange -> {{1, 3}, {1, 3}}, 

ScalingFunctions -> {None, {# + 2 &, # - 2 &}}]
Plot[x, {x, -1, 3}, PlotRange -> {{1, 3}, {1, 3}},
ScalingFunctions -> {None, {2 # &, #/2 &}}]

Mathematica graphics


And why does removing the PlotRange option make the first one almost work, but the second one fails mysteriously?


Plot[x, {x, -1, 3}, ScalingFunctions -> {None, {# + 2 &, # - 2 &}}]
Plot[x, {x, -1, 3}, ScalingFunctions -> {None, {2 # &, #/2 &}}]

Mathematica graphics



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...