Skip to main content

conversion - ToExpression and ToBoxes aren't inverses of each other?


Applying ToExpression and ToBoxes repeatedly to Hold[1/1] gives many 1, which seems strange.


In[11]:= Nest[(ToExpression[ToBoxes[#]] &), Hold[1/1], 10]

Out[11]= Hold[1 (1 (1 (1 (1 (1 (1 (1 (1 (1 (1 x 1/1))))))))))]


This only happens with a denominator of 1. Is it a bug? I'm using Mathematica 10.0 for Microsoft Windows (64-bit) (June 30, 2014).


EDIT: A better question would be: how can I avoid this accumulation? But presumably the answer would just be "use a pattern to detect that special case"...



Answer



It is well-documented!


According to the Documentation page for StandardForm,





  • StandardForm generates output that gives a unique and unambiguous representation of Wolfram Language expressions, suitable for use as input. »





  • StandardForm is the standard format type used for both input and output of Wolfram Language expressions in notebooks.




  • StandardForm is based on boxes.





And then under the "Properties & Relations" section:




Use ToBoxes to get the box representation of an expression in StandardForm:


ToBoxes[x^2 + y^3, StandardForm]


RowBox[{SuperscriptBox["x", "2"], "+", SuperscriptBox["y", "3"]}]

Use ToExpression to convert back:


ToExpression[%]



x^2 + y^3


Based on the above I would say that it is well-documented that ToExpression and ToBoxes are inverses of each other when we work exclusively in the StandardForm (and the expression won't change during evaluation).


If one still isn't completely convinced, I would cite also Documentation pages for MakeExpression (which ToExpression uses under the hood) and MakeBoxes (which ToBoxes uses under the hood):





  • MakeBoxes is the low-level function used in Wolfram System sessions to convert expressions into boxes.





  • MakeExpression is used whenever boxes are supplied as input to the Wolfram Language.




Use MakeExpression to obtain the original expression in a held form:


MakeBoxes[1 + 1, StandardForm]


RowBox[{"1", "+", "1"}]


MakeExpression[%, StandardForm]


HoldComplete[1 + 1]


Summary


StandardForm is the default form used in Wolfram System notebooks which provides a unique and unambiguous representation of Wolfram Language expressions, suitable for use as input. On the low level it is based on boxes and one can convert any WL expression into boxes using MakeBoxes and then get the original expression backward in the held form using MakeExpression.


So the actual functions which (when working exclusively in the StandardForm) are exact inverses for each other are MakeBoxes and MakeExpression. Their only difference from ToBoxes and ToExpression is that they don't evaluate the expression.



Your particular issue


The issue you have encountered is indeed a minor bug.


You can fix it by making the following specific definition for MakeExpression:


MakeExpression[FractionBox["1", "1"], StandardForm] = HoldComplete[Divide[1, 1]];

Now


Nest[(ToExpression[ToBoxes[#]] &), Hold[1/1], 10]


Hold[1 1/1]


and


Nest[(ToExpression[ToBoxes[#]] &), Hold[Divide[1, 1]], 10]


Hold[1/1]

If you wish to fix also the conversion of Hold[1/1] input to Hold[1 1/1], you can add to the above a definition which will treat the 1/1 input in a special way:


MakeExpression[RowBox[{"1", "/", "1"}], StandardForm] = HoldComplete[Divide[1, 1]];


Now


Hold[1/1]


Hold[1/1]

Nest[(ToExpression[ToBoxes[#]] &), Hold[1/1], 10]


Hold[1/1]


A word of warning: I'm not absolutely sure that this solution is free from unexpected side-effects and won't break something in the system. If you encounter any issue, please let me know.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...