Skip to main content

equation solving - Using FindRoot to track moving Bessel Functions zeros


Setting up the problem


I want to study the common zeros of these two functions:


r[x_, y_] := Sqrt[x^2 + y^2];
Θ[x_, y_] := ArcTan[x, y];


f[x_, y_, t_] := 1/2 - BesselK[0, r[x, y]]/(2 BesselK[0, 1]) + ϵ1[t] BesselK[0, r[x, y]]/BesselK[0, 1] + D1[t] BesselK[1, r[x, y]]/(2 BesselK[1, 1]) Cos[Θ[x, y] + ζ1[t]]

g[x_, y_, t_] := Sin[Θ[x, y] + ζ2[t]]/ r[x, y] + ϵ2/2 r[x, y]^(-1/2) Cos[Θ[x, y]/2]

I assign values to the time-dependent parameters:


ϵ1[t_] = -0.5 + 10^-6 t;
ζ2[t_] = π/3 + 10^-4 t;
ζ1[t_] = π/3 + 10^-6 t;
ϵ2 = 0.5;
D1[t_] = 0.5 - 10^-3 t;


And I start with t=0. A CountourPlot shows that there are two zeros:


ContourPlot[{g[x, y, 0] == 0, f[x, y, 0] == 0}, {x, -10, 10}, {y, -10,10}]

enter image description here


Their positions are:


  xG0 = x /. FindRoot[{f[x, y, 0] == 0, g[x, y, 0] == 0}, {x, 0.1}, {y, -1},        AccuracyGoal -> 5]
yG0 = y /. FindRoot[{f[x, y, 0] == 0, g[x, y, 0] == 0}, {x, 0.1}, {y, -1}, AccuracyGoal -> 5]

(* 0.378089 *)

(* -1.26037 *)

And:


  xG0b =  x /. FindRoot[{f[x, y, 0] == 0, g[x, y, 0] == 0}, {x, -1}, {y, 1},       AccuracyGoal -> 5]
yG0b = y /. FindRoot[{f[x, y, 0] == 0, g[x, y, 0] == 0}, {x, -1}, {y, 1}, AccuracyGoal -> 5]

(* -1.02897 *)
(* 1.31148 *)

Tracking the zeros:



Now, I want to be able to track their positions as the variable t (time) increases.


In order to do this, I have devised a simple For loop with discretised time-stepping, which I Break when the two zeros get close enough.


At each time step, I look for the i-th zero in a neighbourhood of the previous one, so that each individual zero is not mistaken with the other one.


(* number of steps *)
Nf=100;

(* Final time *)
Tf = 10000;

(* Time Step *)

dt=Tf/Nf;

(* arrays with the positions and distance *)
xGc = Table[0, {i, Nf + 1}];
yGc = Table[0, {i, Nf + 1}];
xGb = Table[0, {i, Nf + 1}];
yGb = Table[0, {i, Nf + 1}];
PosC = Table[{0, 0}, {i, Nf + 1}];
PosB = Table[{0, 0}, {i, Nf + 1}];
Distanza = Table[0, {i, Nf + 1}];


(* I assign the first elements - initial positions *)
xGb[[1]] = xG0b;
yGb[[1]] = yG0b;
xGc[[1]] = xG0;
yGc[[1]] = yG0;
PosB[[1]] = {xG0b, yG0b};
PosC[[1]] = {xG0, yG0};
Distanza[[1]] = ((yGb[[1]] - yGc[[1]])^2 + (xGb[[1]] - xGc[[1]])^2)^(1/2);


(* Search region tolerance*)
xtol=0.1;
ytol=xtol;

(* For Loop *)

For[i = 2, i <= Nf + 1, i = i + 1, t = (i - 1) dt;

(* I look for the i-th zero in a neighbourhood of the previous one *)


xGc[[i]] =
x /. FindRoot[{f[x, y, t] == 0, g[x, y, t] == 0}, {x,
xGc[[i - 1]], xGc[[i - 1]] - xtol, xGc[[i - 1]] + xtol}, {y,
yGc[[i - 1]], yGc[[i - 1]] - ytol, yGc[[i - 1]] + ytol},
AccuracyGoal -> 2, PrecisionGoal -> 2];
yGc[[i]] =
y /. FindRoot[{f[x, y, t] == 0, g[x, y, t] == 0}, {x,
xGc[[i - 1]], xGc[[i - 1]] - xtol, xGc[[i - 1]] + xtol}, {y,
yGc[[i - 1]], yGc[[i - 1]] - ytol, yGc[[i - 1]] + ytol},
AccuracyGoal -> 2, PrecisionGoal -> 2];


xGb[[i]] =
x /. FindRoot[{f[x, y, t] == 0, g[x, y, t] == 0}, {x,
xGb[[i - 1]], xGb[[i - 1]] - xtol, xGb[[i - 1]] + xtol}, {y,
yGb[[i - 1]], yGb[[i - 1]] - ytol, yGb[[i - 1]] + ytol},
AccuracyGoal -> 2, PrecisionGoal -> 2];
yGb[[i]] =
y /. FindRoot[{f[x, y, t] == 0, g[x, y, t] == 0}, {x,
xGb[[i - 1]], xGb[[i - 1]] - xtol, xGb[[i - 1]] + xtol}, {y,
yGb[[i - 1]], yGb[[i - 1]] - ytol, yGb[[i - 1]] + ytol},

AccuracyGoal -> 2, PrecisionGoal -> 2];

Distanza[[i]] =
N[((yGb[[i]] - yGc[[i]])^2 + (xGb[[i]] - xGc[[i]])^2)^(1/2)];

PosB[[i]] = {xGb[[i]], yGb[[i]]};
PosC[[i]] = {xGc[[i]], yGc[[i]]};

If[Distanza[[i]] <= 0.5,
Tf = t;

Nf = i;
xGc[[Nf + 1]] = xGc[[i]];
xGb[[Nf + 1]] = xGb[[i]];
yGb[[Nf + 1]] = yGb[[i]];
yGc[[Nf + 1]] = yGc[[i]];
Break[]
]
]

I get various errors:



FindRoot::reged: The point {-0.350794,0.695484} is at the edge of the search region {0.695484,0.895484} in coordinate 2 and the computed search direction points outside the region. >>

FindRoot::reged: The point {-0.350794,0.695484} is at the edge of the search region {0.695484,0.895484} in coordinate 2 and the computed search direction points outside the region. >>

FindRoot::reged: The point {-0.290278,0.595484} is at the edge of the search region {0.595484,0.795484} in coordinate 2 and the computed search direction points outside the region. >>

General::stop: Further output of FindRoot::reged will be suppressed during this calculation. >>

FindRoot::lstol: The line search decreased the step size to within tolerance specified by AccuracyGoal and PrecisionGoal but was unable to find a sufficient decrease in the merit function. You may need more than MachinePrecision digits of working precision to meet these tolerances. >>


FindRoot::lstol: The line search decreased the step size to within tolerance specified by AccuracyGoal and PrecisionGoal but was unable to find a sufficient decrease in the merit function. You may need more than MachinePrecision digits of working precision to meet these tolerances. >>

FindRoot::lstol: The line search decreased the step size to within tolerance specified by AccuracyGoal and PrecisionGoal but was unable to find a sufficient decrease in the merit function. You may need more than MachinePrecision digits of working precision to meet these tolerances. >>

General::stop: Further output of FindRoot::lstol will be suppressed during this calculation. >>

And when I plot some of the position variables (here Distanza and xGb), I see some suspect jumps:


enter image description here


Questions:


1) Why do I see the errors, and how could I improve the situation?



2) Is there a way to implement an adaptive Search-region size, so that if I get an error I increase xtol and ytol until I find the zero within the right accuracy?


3) Would something like the extrapolation of a guess from the two previous zeros help more? How would I go about implementing that?




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...