Skip to main content

string manipulation - Dataset fails on StringMatchQ warning due to Missing value


Missing values are a pain mathematically and computationally in general not just in WL, but I think this problem is more related to Dataset handling of warnings:


Select Works w/ a warning on Association lists::


{<|"a" -> "hey"|>, <| "a" -> Missing[]|>} // 
Select[StringMatchQ[#a, "hey"] &]


StringMatchQ::strse: "String or list of strings expected at position 1 in \!\(StringMatchQ[Missing[], \"hey\"]\). "
{<|"a" -> "hey"|>}


Fails as a Query:


Dataset[{<|"a" -> "hey"|>, <| "a" -> Missing[]|>} ] [
Select[StringMatchQ[#a, "hey"] &]]


Missing["Failed"]



The Dataset docs only mentions Missing 4x and not in this context. Is there a workaround that lets it ignore such warnings?



Answer



In the example you give, your Query function asks if the value at element "a" is a string match for "hey". This generates the message because the value for a is not a string in the second row of your dataset.



For this particular case, one solution would be to require an exact match:


data = Dataset[{<|"a" -> "hey"|>, <|"a" -> Missing[]|>}];
Normal@data[Select[#a === "hey"&]]


{<|"a"->"hey"}|>

This works just fine in the example, but if you need to use an actual string match, e.g. of a string pattern, rather than a match using SameQ (===), I don't see a method that's particularly more elegant than changing your select function:


data[Select[StringQ[#a] && StringMatchQ[#a, "hey"] &]]


That said, as chuy noted in your question's comments, you can also force the #a to be a string:


data[Select[StringMatchQ[ToString[#a], "hey"] &]]

Or, as alancalvitti noted, you can pre-select the valid rows:


data[All, {"a" -> Replace[_Missing -> ""]}][Select[#a == "hey" &]]

Or, as Hans points out, you can use a Quiet[] form:


data[Select[Quiet[StringMatchQ[#a "hey"]] &]]

All of these produce correct results.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...