Skip to main content

JoinAcross on nested association by nested key


I would like to join two associations on nested keys. Is this possible?



first = {<|"away" -> <|"name" -> "bob", "money" -> 10 |>, "home" -> <|"name" -> "Sue", "money" -> 15 |>|>, <|"away" -> <|"name" -> "Joe", "money" -> 20 |>, "home" -> <|"name" -> "Jane", "money" -> 25 |>|>}

second = {<|"away" -> <|"name" -> "bob", "Sex" -> "male" |>, "home" -> <|"name" -> "Sue", "sex" -> "female"|>|>, <|"away" -> <|"name" -> "Joe", "Sex" -> "Male" |>, "home" -> <|"name" -> "Jane", "Sex" -> "Female" |>|>}

result=JoinAcross[first, second, ?? ?]

What I would like is:


result = {<|"away" -> <|"name" -> "bob", "money" -> 10, "Sex" -> "male"|>, "home" -> <|"name" -> "Sue", "money" -> 15, "sex" -> "female"|>|>, <|"away" -> <|"name" -> "Joe", "money" -> 20, "Sex" -> "Male"|>, "home" -> <|"name" -> "Jane", "money" -> 25, "Sex" -> "Female"|>|>}

It does not work on just the "away" key due to the "away" key in first and second not being exactly the same and JoinAcross[first,second,"Outer"] just yields a Join.



Is it possible to join across a nested key?


I have tried


JoinAcross[first, second, "away"]

and several variations with zero success.


Thank you.



Answer



JoinAcross cannot reference subparts. The desired result can be obtained using the following expression:


GatherBy[Join[first, second], #[[All, "name"]] &] // Map[Merge[Association]]


% === result
(* True *)

This is basically equivalent to using JoinAcross with full-outer-join semantics.


Explanation


The ultimate goal is to relationally join associations by a composite key consisting of the away and home name values. That is, for each association a we wish to use the key a[[All, "name"]], e.g.:


First[first][[All, "name"]]

(* <| "away" -> "bob", "home" -> "Sue" |>


We could been more explicit about the outer key names by using {"away", "home"} instead of All, but we will stick with the shorter form for now.


Unfortunately, JoinAcross only permits Key syntax, and Key does not presently support subpart references. We have little option but to implement the join directly ourselves.


In order to merge related associations from the two lists first and second, we need to gather those associations together using the desired composite key:


GatherBy[Join[first, second], #[[All, "name"]] &]

(*
{ { <| "away" -> <|"name"->"bob","money"->10|>
, "home" -> <|"name"->"Sue","money"->15|>
|>
, <| "away" -> <|"name"->"bob","Sex"->"male"|>

, "home" -> <|"name"->"Sue","sex"->"female"|>
|>
}
, { <| "away" -> <|"name"->"Joe","money"->20|>
, "home" -> <|"name"->"Jane","money"->25|>
|>
, <| "away" -> <|"name"->"Joe","Sex"->"Male"|>
, "home" -> <|"name"->"Jane","Sex"->"Female"|>
|>
}

}
*)

The result is a list of sublists, each sublist containing a two-level nested association from first and another such nested assocation from second. We wish to produce a single merged association from each sublist:


Assocation will bring together two associations, discarding duplicate keys from the second:


Association[{<|"name"->"bob","money"->10|>, <|"name"->"bob","Sex"->"male"|>}]

(* <| "name"->"bob", "money"->10, "Sex"->"male" |> *)

Merge will bring together two associations, but instead of discarding values duplicate keys will use a function to compute a merged value. Thus, we can use Merge in conjunction with Association from above to merge our away/home pairs:



{ <| "away" -> <|"name"->"bob","money"->10|>
, "home" -> <|"name"->"Sue","money"->15|>
|>
, <| "away" -> <|"name"->"bob","Sex"->"male"|>
, "home" -> <|"name"->"Sue","sex"->"female"|>
|>
} // Merge[Association]

(*
<| "away" -> <|"name"->"bob","money"->10,"Sex"->"male"|>

, "home"-> <|"name"->"Sue","money"->15,"sex"->"female"|>
|>
*)

We Map to perform this merge upon all sublists. Putting it all together, we obtain our final expression:


GatherBy[Join[first, second], #[[All, "name"]] &] // Map[Merge[Association]]

This is essentially equivalent to JoinAcross with full-outer-join semantics. If inner-join semantics are required, we need to add a stage that filters out unmatched elements:


GatherBy[Join[first, second], #[[All, "name"]] &] //
Select[Length@# > 1 &] //

Map[Merge[Association]]

Left- or right-outer-join semantics would require more elaborate filtering and is left as an exercise for the reader.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...