Skip to main content

Am I missing anything? Solving Equations


I want to know what $ a^4+b^4+c^4 $ would be when


$ a+b+c=1, a^2+b^2+c^2=2, a^3+b^3+c^3=3. $


I tried


Solve[{a + b + c == 1, a^2 + b^2 + c^2 == 2, 
a^3 + b^3 + c^3 == 3}, {a, b, c}]


a^4 + b^4 + c^4 /. {a -> ... }

I copied and pasted one instance from the result of Solve[] into {a -> ...}


The solution and the result of Simplify[] of it was not quite what I expected.


So as a test, I tried a+b+c /. {a -> ...}


Still it was strange, it didn't come up with 1 which is obvious correct answer.


So am I missing anything here?


Is there any better way?



Answer



Solve your equations with respect to another variable d == a^4 + b^4 + c^4 eliminating given ones



Solve[{ a + b + c == 1,       a^2 + b^2 + c^2 == 2, 
a^3 + b^3 + c^3 == 3, a^4 + b^4 + c^4 == d}, {d}, {a, b, c}]


{{d -> 25/6}}

This tutorial will be helpful Eliminating Variables.


Edit


For the sake of completeness we add another methods of dealing with the problem. Let's point out even simpler way than the first one, just add assumptions to Simplify:


Simplify[ a^4 + b^4 + c^4, {a + b + c == 1, a^2 + b^2 + c^2 == 2, a^3 + b^3 + c^3 == 3}]



25/6

Of course we can use FullSimplify as well. In this case, Simplify works nicely, but the first method is stronger and should work in more general cases.


SymmetricReduction is more appropriate when we would like to get symbolic results, i.e. here we would like to express a^4 + b^4 + c^4 in terms of these polynomials: {a + b + c, a^2 + b^2 + c^2, a^3 + b^3 + c^3}


First we need to get rid of unknown symmetric polynomials (we know only a + b + c):


 SymmetricPolynomial[#, {a, b, c}] & /@ Range[3]



{a + b + c, a b + a c + b c, a b c}

form the last reduction using the previous ones:


First @ SymmetricReduction[ a^# + b^# + c^#, {a, b, c}] & /@ Range[4] // Column


a + b + c

(a + b + c)^2 - 2 (a b + a c + b c)


3 a b c + (a + b + c)^3 - 3 (a + b + c) (a b + a c + b c)

4 a b c (a + b + c) + (a + b + c)^4 - 4 (a + b + c)^2 (a b + a c + b c)
+ 2 (a b + a c + b c)^2

Now we have a^4 + b^4 + c^4 expressed in terms of given polynomials:


str = 
First[ SymmetricReduction[ a^4 + b^4 + c^4, {a, b, c}]] //. {
(a b + a c + b c) -> 1/2 (a + b + c)^2 - 1/2 (a^2 + b^2 + c^2),
(a b c) -> 1/3 (a^3 + b^3 + c^3) - 1/3 (a + b + c)^3 + (a + b + c) (a b + a c + b c)}



 (a + b + c)^4 - 4 (a + b + c)^2 (1/2 (a + b + c)^2 + 1/2 (-a^2 - b^2 - c^2))
+ 2 (1/2(a + b + c)^2 + 1/2(-a^2 - b^2 - c^2))^2 + 4(a + b + c) (-(1/3)(a + b + c)^3
+ 1/3 (a^3 + b^3 + c^3) + (a + b + c) (1/2 (a + b + c)^2 + 1/2 (-a^2 - b^2 - c^2)))

of course


Simplify @ %



a^4 + b^4 + c^4

and finally:


str /. {a + b + c -> 1, (-a^2 - b^2 - c^2) -> -2, (a^3 + b^3 + c^3) -> 3}


25/6

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....