Skip to main content

Am I missing anything? Solving Equations


I want to know what a4+b4+c4 would be when


a+b+c=1,a2+b2+c2=2,a3+b3+c3=3.


I tried


Solve[{a + b + c == 1, a^2 + b^2 + c^2 == 2, 
a^3 + b^3 + c^3 == 3}, {a, b, c}]


a^4 + b^4 + c^4 /. {a -> ... }

I copied and pasted one instance from the result of Solve[] into {a -> ...}


The solution and the result of Simplify[] of it was not quite what I expected.


So as a test, I tried a+b+c /. {a -> ...}


Still it was strange, it didn't come up with 1 which is obvious correct answer.


So am I missing anything here?


Is there any better way?



Answer



Solve your equations with respect to another variable d == a^4 + b^4 + c^4 eliminating given ones



Solve[{ a + b + c == 1,       a^2 + b^2 + c^2 == 2, 
a^3 + b^3 + c^3 == 3, a^4 + b^4 + c^4 == d}, {d}, {a, b, c}]


{{d -> 25/6}}

This tutorial will be helpful Eliminating Variables.


Edit


For the sake of completeness we add another methods of dealing with the problem. Let's point out even simpler way than the first one, just add assumptions to Simplify:


Simplify[ a^4 + b^4 + c^4, {a + b + c == 1, a^2 + b^2 + c^2 == 2, a^3 + b^3 + c^3 == 3}]



25/6

Of course we can use FullSimplify as well. In this case, Simplify works nicely, but the first method is stronger and should work in more general cases.


SymmetricReduction is more appropriate when we would like to get symbolic results, i.e. here we would like to express a^4 + b^4 + c^4 in terms of these polynomials: {a + b + c, a^2 + b^2 + c^2, a^3 + b^3 + c^3}


First we need to get rid of unknown symmetric polynomials (we know only a + b + c):


 SymmetricPolynomial[#, {a, b, c}] & /@ Range[3]



{a + b + c, a b + a c + b c, a b c}

form the last reduction using the previous ones:


First @ SymmetricReduction[ a^# + b^# + c^#, {a, b, c}] & /@ Range[4] // Column


a + b + c

(a + b + c)^2 - 2 (a b + a c + b c)


3 a b c + (a + b + c)^3 - 3 (a + b + c) (a b + a c + b c)

4 a b c (a + b + c) + (a + b + c)^4 - 4 (a + b + c)^2 (a b + a c + b c)
+ 2 (a b + a c + b c)^2

Now we have a^4 + b^4 + c^4 expressed in terms of given polynomials:


str = 
First[ SymmetricReduction[ a^4 + b^4 + c^4, {a, b, c}]] //. {
(a b + a c + b c) -> 1/2 (a + b + c)^2 - 1/2 (a^2 + b^2 + c^2),
(a b c) -> 1/3 (a^3 + b^3 + c^3) - 1/3 (a + b + c)^3 + (a + b + c) (a b + a c + b c)}



 (a + b + c)^4 - 4 (a + b + c)^2 (1/2 (a + b + c)^2 + 1/2 (-a^2 - b^2 - c^2))
+ 2 (1/2(a + b + c)^2 + 1/2(-a^2 - b^2 - c^2))^2 + 4(a + b + c) (-(1/3)(a + b + c)^3
+ 1/3 (a^3 + b^3 + c^3) + (a + b + c) (1/2 (a + b + c)^2 + 1/2 (-a^2 - b^2 - c^2)))

of course


Simplify @ %



a^4 + b^4 + c^4

and finally:


str /. {a + b + c -> 1, (-a^2 - b^2 - c^2) -> -2, (a^3 + b^3 + c^3) -> 3}


25/6

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

How to remap graph properties?

Graph objects support both custom properties, which do not have special meanings, and standard properties, which may be used by some functions. When importing from formats such as GraphML, we usually get a result with custom properties. What is the simplest way to remap one property to another, e.g. to remap a custom property to a standard one so it can be used with various functions? Example: Let's get Zachary's karate club network with edge weights and vertex names from here: http://nexus.igraph.org/api/dataset_info?id=1&format=html g = Import[ "http://nexus.igraph.org/api/dataset?id=1&format=GraphML", {"ZIP", "karate.GraphML"}] I can remap "name" to VertexLabels and "weights" to EdgeWeight like this: sp[prop_][g_] := SetProperty[g, prop] g2 = g // sp[EdgeWeight -> (PropertyValue[{g, #}, "weight"] & /@ EdgeList[g])] // sp[VertexLabels -> (# -> PropertyValue[{g, #}, "name"]...