Skip to main content

front end - Can a Dynamic be attached to the single elements of a list?


Consider the following example:


DynamicModule[{foo = {Red, Green}, switchColor},
Attributes[switchColor] = {HoldAll};
switchColor[c_] := If[c === Red, c = Green, c = Red];
{
Dynamic[Print["redrawing first"]; foo[[1]]],
Dynamic[Print["redrawing Second"]; foo[[2]]],
Button["Switch first", switchColor[foo[[1]]]],

Button["Switch second", switchColor[foo[[2]]]]
}
]


(in the gif for some reason it appears that the first color is updated incorrectly, while this is not the case)


This works totally fine, but a quick look to the messages reveals that even when changing only a single element of the list, both of the Dynamic are updated.


Now, this is not really surprising: there is just one variable to be tracked. However, I was wondering if there was a way to go around this, as it can be handy to be able to track independently single elements of a list.


One way around it is to fine foo as a list of held variables, and wire Dynamic to those variables directly. This works, as can be seen in the following:


DynamicModule[{

foo = Table[Hold@Evaluate@Unique["color$"], {2}],
switchColor
},
Scan[# /. Hold[s_] :> Set[s, Red] &, foo];
switchColor[c_Hold] := If[
ReleaseHold@c === Red,
c /. Hold[s_] :> Set[s, Green],
c /. Hold[s_] :> Set[s, Red]
];
{

Dynamic[Print["redrawing first"];
ReleaseHold@foo[[1]]
],
Dynamic[Print["redrawing second"];
ReleaseHold@foo[[2]]
],
Button["Switch first", switchColor[foo[[1]]]],
Button["Switch second", switchColor[foo[[2]]]]
}
]


enter image description here


My problem with this approach is that I suspect that this makes the variables that are actually being used, that is, color$xxxx, not being defined in front end, as would be the case for variables localised inside a DynamicModule.


Is there a way around this? Or can I somehow force the variables to be defined in the front end like they would be in a DynamicModule?




Bonus question:


Why does the above code work? Having Dynamic the HoldFirst attribute I would have expected it not to be able to understand that the variable to be tracked is the one inside the hold in the first element of foo. How does it do that?



Answer



I think I got it. Again using bump from Elegant manipulation of the variables list


func_[a___, bump[lst_, idx___], b___] ^:= 

func[a, #, b] & @ Part[List @@@ Unevaluated @@ {lst}, {1}, idx]

Unique @ Table["color$", {2}] /. _[x__] :>
DynamicModule[{foo, switchColor, x},
foo = Hold[x];

switchColor[c_] := c = If[c === Red, Green, Red];

switchColor /@ bump[foo];


{
Dynamic[ Context @ bump[foo, 1] ],
Dynamic[ Print["redrawing first"]; foo[[1]] ],
Dynamic[ Print["redrawing second"]; foo[[2]] ],
Button["Switch first", switchColor @ bump[foo, 1]],
Button["Switch second", switchColor @ bump[foo, 2]]
}
]

enter image description here



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....