Skip to main content

differential equations - How to use NDSolve with discontinuities at internal boundaries?


I don’t know how to impose discontinuous internal boundary conditions (BCs) in NDSolve, so I’ve set up an example problem to illustrate my issue. Consider the simple first-order ODE for f(z) on the interval 1z1:


k f[z] + f'[z] == 0

where k is an eigenvalue to be determined. At the interval edges I fix f(1) and f(1) to the two constants fL and fR, respectively. But I also want to be able to specify a jump discontinuity internally at z=0 by setting the ratio f(0+)/f(0) to a third fixed value r0. Since the above ODE is satisfied by a single exponential, it’s easy to match all the BCs and solve analytically for k and f(z), resulting in:


kEV[fL_, fR_, r0_] := Log[r0 fL/fR]/2;

fSol[fL_, fR_, r0_, z_] :=
Module[{k}, k = kEV[fL, fR, r0];
UnitStep[-z] fL Exp[-k (1 + z)] + UnitStep[z] fR Exp[k (1 - z)] ]


Let’s look at two examples of this solution with fL=e2 and fR=1. First, setting r0=1 eliminates the internal discontinuity and gives a nice smooth curve with k=1:


Plot[fSol[Exp[2.], 1., 1., z], {z, -1, 1}, 
PlotRange -> {{-1, 1}, {0, Automatic}}, Exclusions -> None,
Epilog ->
Inset[Style["k = " <> ToString[kEV[Exp[2.], 1., 1.]],
14], {-.5, .5}]]

Graph 1


Second, putting r0=0.5 gives a discontinuous solution with k=0.653426:



Plot[fSol[Exp[2.], 1., .5, z], {z, -1, 1}, 
PlotRange -> {{-1, 1}, {0, Automatic}}, Exclusions -> None,
Epilog ->
Inset[Style["k = " <> ToString[kEV[Exp[2.], 1., .5]],
14], {-.5, .5}]]

Graph 2


Now the crux of my question: how to get both of these results using NDSolve? It’s straightforward to duplicate the continuous plot above by simply ignoring the internal boundary and solving numerically with just the two edge BCs:


sol = NDSolve[{k[z] f[z] + f'[z] == 0, k'[z] == 0, 
f[-1] == Exp[2], f[1] == 1}, {f, k}, {z, -1, 1}];


Plot[Evaluate[f[z] /. sol], {z, -1, 1},
PlotRange -> {{-1, 1}, {0, Automatic}}, Exclusions -> None,
Epilog ->
Inset[Style["k = " <> ToString[k[1.] /. sol[[1]]], 14], {-.5, .5}]]

Graph 3


But at this point I’m stuck and can’t see how to repeat the discontinuous case with NDSolve. According to the documentation, the “Chasing” method can solve multipoint boundary value problems, allowing the imposition of internal BCs, but the only example shown seems to assume continuity on the internal boundaries. What I need, but lack, is a mechanism in NDSolve for specifying the solution (and its derivatives for higher-order problems) just to the left and, separately, just to the right of an internal boundary. Can anyone suggest a way to make NDSolve work for my discontinuous case? Thanks!



Answer



Working solution



One can manually implement the shooting method with ParametricNDSolveValue and FindRoot:


psol = ParametricNDSolveValue[{k f[z] + f'[z] == 0, f[-1] == Exp[2], 
WhenEvent[z == 0, f[z] -> r0 f[z]]}, f, {z, -1, 1}, {k, r0}];
k0 = k /. FindRoot[psol[k, 0.5][1] == 1, {k, 1}]
(* 0.653426 *)

Plot[psol[k0, 0.5][z], {z, -1, 1}]

Mathematica graphics


Original -- revealing some bugginess in NDSolve



Something like this? [Edit: As @xzczx pointed out, NDSolve does this wrong. I feel it should work, but does not. I know what it looks like it's doing (see comments), but if I figure what it actually is doing, I will update.]


Block[{r0 = 0.5},
{sol} =
NDSolve[{k[z] f[z] + f'[z] == 0, k'[z] == 0, f[-1] == Exp[2], f[1] == 1,
WhenEvent[z == 0, f[z] -> r0 f[z]]},
{f, k}, {z, -1, 1}]
];

Plot[f[z] /. sol // Evaluate, {z, -1, 1}]


Mathematica graphics


For some reason, NDSolve settles on a value for k[z] very close to 1, which is the solution for the OP's first BVP without the discontinuity.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]