Skip to main content

differential equations - How to use NDSolve with discontinuities at internal boundaries?


I don’t know how to impose discontinuous internal boundary conditions (BCs) in NDSolve, so I’ve set up an example problem to illustrate my issue. Consider the simple first-order ODE for $f(z)$ on the interval $-1 ≤ z ≤ 1$:


k f[z] + f'[z] == 0

where $k$ is an eigenvalue to be determined. At the interval edges I fix $f(-1)$ and $f(1)$ to the two constants $f_L$ and $f_R$, respectively. But I also want to be able to specify a jump discontinuity internally at $z = 0$ by setting the ratio $f(0+)/f(0-)$ to a third fixed value $r_0$. Since the above ODE is satisfied by a single exponential, it’s easy to match all the BCs and solve analytically for $k$ and $f(z)$, resulting in:


kEV[fL_, fR_, r0_] := Log[r0 fL/fR]/2;

fSol[fL_, fR_, r0_, z_] :=
Module[{k}, k = kEV[fL, fR, r0];
UnitStep[-z] fL Exp[-k (1 + z)] + UnitStep[z] fR Exp[k (1 - z)] ]


Let’s look at two examples of this solution with $f_L = e^2$ and $f_R = 1$. First, setting $r_0 = 1$ eliminates the internal discontinuity and gives a nice smooth curve with $k = 1$:


Plot[fSol[Exp[2.], 1., 1., z], {z, -1, 1}, 
PlotRange -> {{-1, 1}, {0, Automatic}}, Exclusions -> None,
Epilog ->
Inset[Style["k = " <> ToString[kEV[Exp[2.], 1., 1.]],
14], {-.5, .5}]]

Graph 1


Second, putting $r_0 = 0.5$ gives a discontinuous solution with $k = 0.653426$:



Plot[fSol[Exp[2.], 1., .5, z], {z, -1, 1}, 
PlotRange -> {{-1, 1}, {0, Automatic}}, Exclusions -> None,
Epilog ->
Inset[Style["k = " <> ToString[kEV[Exp[2.], 1., .5]],
14], {-.5, .5}]]

Graph 2


Now the crux of my question: how to get both of these results using NDSolve? It’s straightforward to duplicate the continuous plot above by simply ignoring the internal boundary and solving numerically with just the two edge BCs:


sol = NDSolve[{k[z] f[z] + f'[z] == 0, k'[z] == 0, 
f[-1] == Exp[2], f[1] == 1}, {f, k}, {z, -1, 1}];


Plot[Evaluate[f[z] /. sol], {z, -1, 1},
PlotRange -> {{-1, 1}, {0, Automatic}}, Exclusions -> None,
Epilog ->
Inset[Style["k = " <> ToString[k[1.] /. sol[[1]]], 14], {-.5, .5}]]

Graph 3


But at this point I’m stuck and can’t see how to repeat the discontinuous case with NDSolve. According to the documentation, the “Chasing” method can solve multipoint boundary value problems, allowing the imposition of internal BCs, but the only example shown seems to assume continuity on the internal boundaries. What I need, but lack, is a mechanism in NDSolve for specifying the solution (and its derivatives for higher-order problems) just to the left and, separately, just to the right of an internal boundary. Can anyone suggest a way to make NDSolve work for my discontinuous case? Thanks!



Answer



Working solution



One can manually implement the shooting method with ParametricNDSolveValue and FindRoot:


psol = ParametricNDSolveValue[{k f[z] + f'[z] == 0, f[-1] == Exp[2], 
WhenEvent[z == 0, f[z] -> r0 f[z]]}, f, {z, -1, 1}, {k, r0}];
k0 = k /. FindRoot[psol[k, 0.5][1] == 1, {k, 1}]
(* 0.653426 *)

Plot[psol[k0, 0.5][z], {z, -1, 1}]

Mathematica graphics


Original -- revealing some bugginess in NDSolve



Something like this? [Edit: As @xzczx pointed out, NDSolve does this wrong. I feel it should work, but does not. I know what it looks like it's doing (see comments), but if I figure what it actually is doing, I will update.]


Block[{r0 = 0.5},
{sol} =
NDSolve[{k[z] f[z] + f'[z] == 0, k'[z] == 0, f[-1] == Exp[2], f[1] == 1,
WhenEvent[z == 0, f[z] -> r0 f[z]]},
{f, k}, {z, -1, 1}]
];

Plot[f[z] /. sol // Evaluate, {z, -1, 1}]


Mathematica graphics


For some reason, NDSolve settles on a value for k[z] very close to 1, which is the solution for the OP's first BVP without the discontinuity.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.